You can get a Linux container image as well I think.

It is a punishment in the form of public humiliation, taking your autonomy, and dehumanizing you. People will automatically assume you've done something wrong if you're in handcuffs.

So you engaged with the content, the ultimate reason why it was created in the first place. He's not going to go through the trouble if it doesn't make money. Might as well just scream into the void if nobody watches it.

Did you watch the video on YouTube?

What did the journalist gain by confronting him? Nothing we didn't already know.

What is your definition of won? Because that's what it means.

The rest of the paragraph?

It was probably the best result he could expect. And that is before the interview became viral and millions upon millions got to hear his whole speech delivered. The journalist is well intentioned, but the result is catastrophic.

Replace the word "won" with "got what he wanted from"

I don’t know what you guys are seeing, but it is quite clear that Trump’s guy ~~won~~ got what he wanted from this exchange. It was probably the best result he could expect. And that is before the interview became viral and millions upon millions got to hear his whole speech delivered. The journalist is well intentioned, but the result is catastrophic.

Journalists will do whatever gets engagement to show numbers to advertisers and this kind of crap gets engagement as seen here. Whenever you engage with this type of content you are giving these people a platform to spout nonsense and lies.

It's because you're not reading the entire thing and stopped paying attention when they used the word "won." Go back and reread the entire paragraph.

Exactly, he's getting the attention that he wants, he's in the headlines, you're talking about it. Stop giving these people headlines.

I know

I saw a job posting for a court domestic violence advocate and they would probably reject men on principle.