False. They'll track whether you have an account or not. Even NoScript won't completely disable their tracking. If you use the web, Meta is watching you.

🎶Blame it on my AD*(H)*D baby🎶

It's EA. You'll be playing it until they randomly decide to turn off the servers.

Google: 🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑💰💰💰💰💰

Ees relatable.

Honestly, and the occasional shrine and came back from my house Day and was curious about the Shinto and I think I see it's a rainy weekend but it is particularly religious and I don't struggle to find it's a rainy thing but it is a heaven to see you and you wouldn't have been fun with you in line.

I mean, yeah same.

CSS features like vertical alignment would be defined by web standards. Those fall under the non-profit org W3C. They're pretty slow about things as to not break the fuck out of everything.

Browser behaviour like merging redirects falls on browsers tho, so yeah, we can blame Chrome or FF on that one.

Wait, toads don't goose...

I type 120. How fucked am I, doctor?

Just because it isn't dangerous to the average individual does not mean it isn't a problem and something that should not be happening.

The entire point of this thread is that from an outsiders perspective, you're only going to see the news articles and form biased opinions. You're going to see "Oh wow, the US has a lot of school shootings, schools must be super dangerous!", meanwhile there were 82 deaths from school shootings last year out of 49.4 million students, or 0.000165% of the student population. Even looking at injuries, we only get to 0.00054%.

Is that number too high? Fuck yes. Any number of children injured or dying due to violence is unacceptable. It's disgusting and the lack of response from our leadership is abhorrent. But are schools in the US dangerous because of this? Absolutely not.

And keeping with their initial example, the US also has a lot of school shootings. Doesn't mean schools are dangerous.

That's still civil. I think this is just a case of fraud plain and simple.