sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 0 points 40 minutes ago

How the fuck is this country even still standing at this point with this chicanery and buffoonery at the reigns?

Basically because various parts of the government were pitted against each other, by design. Various organizations and levels of government have their own objectives, interests and resources and operate with varying amounts of independence and interdependence. It's frankly messy and creates some inefficiency, but it's sort of like biodiversity - a problem that impacts part of the government doesn't impact all of it in the same way or at the same time, so it doesn't completely collapse or grind to a halt.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 2 points 50 minutes ago

I'm playing the remake on PS5. I think they did a pretty nice job with the graphics upgrade, and with the new tracks.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 6 points 13 hours ago

Crash Team Racing is the pinnacle of kart racing games. The driving is more skill-based than the leading brand name, and it doesn't have shitty rubber-band AI.

Star Wars Episode 1 Racer is still great fun, easy to learn but hard to be good at.

Nothing compares to F-Zero GX. The abandonment of the franchise is a travesty, and should be considered abuse of the gaming community.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Someone else has mentioned M-Disc and I want to second that. The benefit of using a storage format like this is that the actual storage media is designed to last a long time, and it is separate from the drive mechanism. This is a very important feature - the data is safe from mechanical, electrical and electronic failure because the storage is independent of the drive. If your drive dies, you can replace it with no risk to the data. Every serious form of archival data storage is the same - the storage media is separate from the reading device.

An M-Disc drive is required to write data, but any DVD or BD drive can read the data. It should be possible to acquire a replacement DVD drive to recover the data from secondary markets (eBay) for a very long time if necessary, even after they're no longer manufactured.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 5 points 2 days ago

Until you realize that interference with the "timeline" means many of the battles never happen

Sure, but that would be the point actually. If you had the kind of complete information about the Axis military deployment and resources in 1941 that this scenario would provide, you wouldn't apply that information willy-nilly, one battle at a time. You would plan a complete campaign to disable the military systems of Germany and Japan all at once, and bide your time until you could implement it.

You would know where every major resource storage is, every production facility, every training facility, every unit deployment, every command headquarters - and the enemy wouldn't know that you know that yet. You would just fully decapitate the command and logistics of the Axis all at once. Any remaining battles would just be a cleanup operation - they can't run tanks, airplanes or ships if we wipe out all of their fuel storage and production because we know where all of it is (or was) in 1941. And because you have the Pentagon staff, you have capable people who could actually plan and organize such an operation.

new tactics can be countered

Eventually, maybe, but if you planned your operations right there simply wouldn't be time. The point isn't to win battles, it's to take away the enemy's ability to start a battle.

modern logistics require strong communications

This is true, and the communication options are limited by the time, but we're not talking about trying to replace the Allies' existing logistics infrastructure. We're talking about using what the Allies already have, with perfect knowledge of what the Axis has when and where, and then picking the right moment to disable their military infrastructure across the board.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 15 points 2 days ago

Oh shit, you're right, I forgot where I was.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 15 points 2 days ago

The engine in the Abrams is actually a "multi-fuel" engine. It's probably cleanest and most efficient on jet fuel, but it can run on marine diesel which is basically trash fuel.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 2 days ago

They could, for a little while. You'd have a very hard time refining petroleum fuel in 1942 to the quality necessary for the jets, so you'd be limited by however much was stored on the base.

I'm also not sure how you'd deploy those aircraft across the Pacific or Atlantic other than disassembling, shipping and then reassembling them.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 33 points 2 days ago

None of the above, all would require infrastructure to support their equipment - infrastructure that is decades beyond the capabilities of the time. 1941 wouldn't even have the electricity generation capacity to turn the lights on.

Instead I would bring the Pentagon. Forget the equipment, that building is full of people who study and operate large-scale logistics, operational security, information collection and analysis, battle tactics and broad strategy. Plus, I guarantee you there's a copy in there of all the records ever collected about the Axis military, and hundreds of postwar analyses of those records - deployments, resources, communications, technology, officer profiles, command structure. That information could probably end the war in a year.

Intelligence, logistics and planning win wars.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 3 days ago

Nonsense, the Saudis buy their military hardware from the US.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 13 points 1 week ago

This is probably relevant:

Japan says China airspace incursion ‘serious violation of our sovereignty’

Japan wouldn't be interested in an increased US military presence if they weren't feeling threatened by their aggressive neighbor.

107

cross-posted from: https://merv.news/post/130483

After the last post publicly by Naomi Wu being

“Ok for those of you that haven't figured it out I got my wings clipped and they weren't gentle about it- so there's not going to be much posting on social media anymore and only on very specific subjects. I can leave but Kaidi can't so we're just going to follow the new rules and that's that. Nothing personal if I don't like and reply like I used to. I'll be focusing on the store and the occasional video. Thanks for understanding, it was fun while it lasted”

Naomi Wu mentions briefly on her silencing and how she is not nearly as safe as she was before now that it’s obvious to the Chinese government her disappearance won’t cause an uproar of bad press making China look bad.

view more: next ›

NaibofTabr

joined 1 year ago