So it takes a flood to consider Poland central Europe
Sunlight definitely played a key role. Can't see your target without sunlight.
They also can't attack assets inside Russia without using Russian airspace. Russian airspace is equally complicit.
Because some mice have a secondary scroll wheel, or the scroll wheel can tilt to scroll sideways
People like to procrastinate
They've been launching cyber attacks at USA for years. Are they not at war yet?
Hostile design right there
Are you using the default shade of green, or did you enable higher contrast setting in accessibility? I hear it helps with readability.
Lol, the ios users will still be subjected to the eye-fucking shade of green when chatting with android users. Apple sure loves to mess with their users.
What do you mean that the search engines contain minimal amount of site's data? Obviously it needs to index all contents to make it searchable. If you search for keywords within an article, you can find the article, therefore all of it needs to be indexed.
Indexing is nothing more than "presenting data to the algorithm" so it'd be against the law to index a site under your proposed legislation.
Wrong. The infringement is in obtaining the data and presenting it to the AI model during the training process. It makes no difference that the original work is not retained in the model's weights afterwards.
This is an interesting take, I'd be inclined to agree, but you're still facing the problem of how to distinguish training AI from indexing for search purposes. I'm afraid you can't have it both ways.
What would be achieved by peace talks? Putin will dig deeper into the lands they occupy and get more time to rebuild their army and strike even harder. It's been proven that he can't be trusted.
I'd be careful with the "always" part. There was a famous case involving Katy Perry where a single chord was sued over as copyright infringement. The case was thrown out on appeal, but I do not doubt that some pretty wild cases have been upheld as copyright violations (see "patent troll").
Are you really trying to argue against a point by providing evidence supporting it?