sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 5 points 1 week ago

I think the real answer isn’t DIY pharmaceuticals, but rather universal healthcare, informed consent, and a medical system (both physicians and pharmaceutical manufacturers) that puts patient care above any kind of profit motive

I think just about everyone here agrees. But the question is what to do until that becomes available. We need something in the interim; dangerous as this all is, I can't find it in me to shun it when the alternative is letting people suffer without access to anything as they desperately wait for a better society to emerge in some unknowable, possibly distant future.

[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

I really don't think these are the same group of people. From the article:

The strike was ignored in some areas, reflecting deep political divisions in Israel after nearly 11 months of fighting.

Those are the people you're thinking of, and they aren't striking.

[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Monopolies depend on the government to exist.

I very much disagree but respect a desire to not get into a debate, so I'll leave it there.

I really don’t know what that means

"Your freedom ends at my face" is a saying used often here to contend with right-wing group's insistence on "freedom," often the kind that involves harming others; e.g. free speech absolutism and the "freedom" to spout neo-Nazi rhetoric that advocates for the murder of minorities, or the "freedom" to not get vaccinated and thus worsen a pandemic. A more full version might be "Your freedom to throw a punch ends where my face begins." The idea is that it is fair to restrict a freedom if it supports the freedom of others — you might not trust governments to determine where those lines lie, and that's fair, but that's a separate issue.

[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

Absolutely none of what you just said justifies Israel willfully bombing hostages.

[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 18 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know if libertarianism courts a different audience in Brazil, but in the U.S. it has a very rabidly right-wing audience who effectively want to tear down as much government as possible, and who view "your freedom ends at my face" as an insult. It's the ideology of an extraordinarily unregulated market – a true "free market" – which is a monopolistic and wildly unethical disaster waiting to happen.

Anarcho-capitalism, which your username references, is all of that, only more. So you might understand why effectively everyone here is going to treat that with extreme suspicion.

[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

It is, but DdCno1's been taking a pro-Israel stance into a very, very pro-Palestine site. I really don't know what else they'd expect besides pushback, honestly.

[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

So you believe that erstwhile hostage rescuers have no responsibility to actually keep the hostages alive, then? Because you're writing apologia for that.

[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

a ruthless movement that would rather sacrifice every single Palestinian man, woman and child than surrender

You know, I've no love for Hamas whatsoever, but I can't help but notice you consider "willingness to sacrifice civilians" to be somehow worse than, say, "actually, literally sacrificing civilians right now." That's not a very good look.

[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

with the ICC waiting with handcuffs behind the banner

This implies other countries wouldn't sooner dismantle the ICC than let it actually do its job, which sadly seems to not be the case.

^(edit:^ ^typo)^

[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

This is why I think monitored access is a better idea than total withholding. Kids are going to end up on social media; either as they grow up and eventually become adults, or as a result of peer providing access & pressure. Best to let them on, but ensure they are safe, know how to be safe, and know why to be safe.

[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 14 points 2 weeks ago

Makes me wonder if it’s intentional to try to make society a worse place with inventive uses of pushing certain trends on international versions of tiktok instead of filtering them out.

Good lord, this is a massive reach. A much simpler explanation is that algorithmic garbage is profitable, and China's government does not care about negative ramifications that occur outside China itself and so do not regulate it.

China's run by a terrible government, not an MCU villain.

[-] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 18 points 1 month ago

Not to mention the obscene fees with using it. Crypto is rife with issues.

view more: next ›

LukeZaz

joined 2 months ago