One, they’re worried about how China and Iran could use Russian technology to beef up their military capabilities, and threaten their — or their allies’ — defence assets around the world.

Well duh.

Two, there’s deep concern about what such steps say about the Kremlin’s frame of mind. Russia had in the past heavily guarded its military advances, especially from potential future rivals such as China. Trading its knowledge now is seen by some as sign of increased recklessness.

Recklessness? To increase the military capabilities of the enemies of the world's most reckless superpower?

What is wrong about having an angry mind state? I think anger is a valid human emotion.

Anodyne.

Shut up vatnik! Go and suck Pootn's boots for youre Xi bucks tanky.

In what way? Where?

I'd bring back my favourite website from the time:

http://imaginers.com/iw

Started me on a career, with Macromedia's product line.

Future news headline: Russia attacks NATO in completely unprovoked move!

This normalises the idea that there was something crooked about the extremely well observed and very robust and modern election system. The point is to con gullible stupid people to soften them up for future violent actions by the US, aswell as to intimidate Venezuelans. It's far from nothing.

New Zealand maybe?

But at what cost?

The Ukraine is more Joever than Biden.

I suppose if Russia did react it would be completely "unprovoked" again, wouldn't it?