sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] LEVI@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Telegram adds option to let users report content on app two weeks after CEO Pavel Durov's arrest After almost 2 weeks of CEO Pavel Durov's arrest, Telegram will start moderating private chats as well.

https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/telegram-halts-end-to-end-encryption-for-personal-chats-two-weeks-after-ceo-pavel-durov-was-arrested-2594919-2024-09-06

this all seem confusing, there's no such thing as "private" chats on Telegram, only secret chats which are E2EE, well even their encrypting is questionable

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 7 points 2 weeks ago

Web rendering engine written in Rust

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm so excited about the "private space" feature

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 10 points 3 weeks ago

I guess I'll just add them to my mental list of companies to avoid.

😆 mental ?! I already have my list in my browser bookmarks

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

Storyboarder ( but I haven't tried it yet ) it seems geared towards 2D animators

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

like WWE wrestling ?!

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)
  • Posts > New
  • Comments > Top

good comments are upvoted for a reason and I wanna see those first... before scrolling to the bad takes... haha

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

One of the best cases for building a versatile tool, is accessibility to less privileged populations, for example people who can't efford to have a reliable Internet because of their shady ISPs, they need a browser that renders web content as fast as possible, and also because they can't afford to download apps due to slow internet speeds, Flatpaks could take gigabyte of HDD space and you have to update them later, which is painful in other parts of the world

Even if the user had a reliable Internet and solid hardware, maybe they're a security minded individual, and want to keep their app installs to a minimum. To them many apps are considered bloat and that's dangerous.

I think the difficulty lies in wisely choosing what features to include, before your users start asking : hey, do we really need that ? Or : who uses that ?

that's why listening to feedback is so important

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

that's interesting, I'm not sure I understand the idea, do you want the browser to monitor the mobile app time usage ( Jerboa ), I'm i correct ?

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

That would also look cool, aesthetically speaking

[-] LEVI@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

firstly, there's always some security and plenty of privacy mischief around focus.

Oh, how so?

i've actually played with this in the firefox debugger and it essentially appears feasible so really hope this feature comes oneday - or i finally get some time to look into making an addon for it

that's cool, yes a browser should stop using resources when you stop using it ( minimize it ), or using that particular tab by making it inactive, chromium based browsers behave like that if I'm not mistaken

45
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by LEVI@feddit.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

And what features and/or technologies you'd rather not see in a web browser

Lets make this interesting: you can imagine features ( there's no wrong answers ) , its not just about features that you already saw in other browsers

view more: next ›

LEVI

joined 1 month ago