What is there to discuss? The article is just stating the obvious: that a news site called "Russia Today" is in cahoots with the Kremlin, the goverment of a country with state-controlled media and well-known influence on Western media.

I think they decided it here

"Safest", that's why we need to think generations ahead to make signs that make clear forever that whatever is behind it shouldn't be touched.

I feel the same, first pro-oil and now pro-nuclear.

We have safer and cheaper regenerative options and it's about damn time we utilise them.

There are reasonable and cost-effective alternatives to nuclear, to planes in many cases not so much. Also a plane crash doesn't leave whole towns uninhabitable for centuries or needs special places to store burned fuel

Nuclear power only has to go wrong once so why risk it?

I got hooked by the gameplay so even though I'm disgusted by the monetisation I come back almost every day.

But 2 x F16 = F32

It looks like someone in the art department had a liking for intestines and wanted something to remind them of it everywhere

Don't worry, they'll try again with the next "game"

It was okay but it never motivated me enough to actually finish it.

God-fucking-dammit

Does he see the shit big publishers have been pumping out for years?