sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] JingJang@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Lots of meta-level comments here so I'll add one that's more in the weeds:

In an office job, it's always good to be friendly with IT and the office manager/administrative assistant.

[-] JingJang@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the simplified explanation and for giving me the mental Image of Rudy Giuliani as a minion. (I can even hear him babbling in minionease...)

[-] JingJang@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

This is a great community.

The Lemmy community is far better than the subreddit

[-] JingJang@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If it's anything like Google Home and even Google Maps recently, it'll be another push away from the Google-Sphere for me.

Google home just keeps getting worse and Google maps has had incorrect street names in my entire region for over a year and despite multiple attempts to get them to correct them, they continue to be wrong.

[-] JingJang@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Fair enough, good reply.

Upvoted :)

(Maybe Lemmy will bring back some good discussions in threads like these...)

I think the public gets fatigued when we hear about the profits these companies make and then we see these comparatively small fines.

If this is how we "steer the vessel of regulation" then I can accept that this is a push in a better direction.

However, I still feel that a fine in the hundreds of millions, ( not bankrupting but a "shot in the leg" versus a "slap on the wrist"), is appropriate for these very large corporations. They already weild so much political and economic power that consequences for things like this should be higher.

In other words, let's encourage them to operate responsibly in the first place.

[-] JingJang@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This isn't a "fine" to Amazon. 25 million dollars is just the cost of business.

Make this 250 or 500 million and then... Maybe.... it's a fine.

JingJang

joined 1 year ago