sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The funny thing with that, I haven't seen a term taken like that from a tech company though.

Xerox is the only one I can think of that came close, Googling at this point...

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 days ago

You keep saying the ONLY POSSIBLE REASON is to get people to buy it twice, I provided reasoning and evidence to the contrary but you don't care, so yes we're done here 👍

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works -2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Companies do different things? Madness! It must be a conspiracy!

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago

You're refusing to understand the reality of developing for the PC market and instead just shifting all the blame on corporate greed and corporate incompetence at the same time.

The only recent console I own is the switch, everything else is PC all day.

I waited for GTA V to come to PC and played it a lot when it did, so... Maybe if you only expect the fomo crowd to be the only gamers in existence... Sure.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Other then they're different systems, console is much easier to test/develop on because its a consistent environment, PCs by comparison have so many potential differences per device that it's much more nuanced.

Would you rather they release a broken ass game on PC or wait and let them optimize and potentially add extra functionality?

I know what I'm picking...

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

To be fair, when gta v did release on PC, it had a bunch of extra features they couldn't get working performatively on the last Gen console hardware.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago

It does it on mobile

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Smaller host sites are generally full of junk and difficult to use, plus can't beat the speeds/infrastructure of something like Netflix.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

It was viral but not likely in a "good" or "nice" way, it was honestly hilarious, my take at the time was, bruh why do you care so much that you're literally having a breakdown about people talking shit about a celebrity.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Only the power of the all spark could solve this captcha.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Idiot user! ;)

In case it's not obvious, I agree that I don't see much of a point in case sensitivity in an OS outside of simply providing additional options for various uses, it absolutely would be confusing for end users having to interact with it in many ways.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I think it was OC only not "no bots"

-10
Emojis and Lemmy (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Does anyone else think having emojis as a response to a comment/thread would be a neat addition instead of only upvote/downvote?

Reddit seemed to sorta do that with awards but thats not quite what I'm suggesting.

Something similar to GitHub for instance, except we keep the upvote downvote system as-is.

This would hopefully discourage the use of upvote/downvote as a "I like/dislike this" button while also adding the ability to more accurately express the emotion the post/comment illicited

Additionally, there are a lot of people who are mostly just lurkers and have no desire to post, but they want to be able to emote further then just a upvote/downvote but DON'T want to actually post a comment like "I love this" or "You're so right" or even just commenting an emoji, because making a comment is a whole extra action that makes them visible, opens up to comments or upvotes/downvotes.

view more: next ›

Jakeroxs

joined 1 year ago