sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] H4rdStyl3z@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago

Just because it's not human doesn't mean I can't show some basic manners. 😅

[-] H4rdStyl3z@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago

It seems more expressive than GPT-4 in general and better at itemizing information, but it's a bit worse at keeping track of context and seems to hallucinate more than GPT-4 (but less than GPT-3). I'm currently on the free trial period so I'll try it out for these two months and then see if it justifies switching over (the subscription is the same price so that won't be the deal-breaker). One thing that it's noticeably better at is researching online, probably because it uses Google as a backend instead of Bing lol.

It's supposed to integrate with other services, if you use the Android/iOS app, as it can replace Google Assistant entirely and get access to info from other Google services. However, the app is unavailable in the EU and a few other countries as of yet, along with image generation. Classic case of EU favoritism towards Microsoft and not sanctioning it like it does Apple and Google... It's also rumored that the ChatGPT Android app will get Assistant API integration "soon", but it's also not yet available (anywhere, AFAIK). Presumably, even if that is the case, Google can probably add in deeper system-level integrations, given how it's their OS and their ecossystem.

[-] H4rdStyl3z@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Gemini Advanced (Ultra) gets it right:

[-] H4rdStyl3z@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

That does make sense. It is a country with a fairly small population, so I begrudgingly have to accept that it has to have some control over this kind of thing, not to overload its public systems.

On the whole I think the concept of countries in general is bullshit but that's a debate best had in another thread.

The thing with the children of migrants being denied residency is truly heartbreaking. Do they become stateless as a result?

[-] H4rdStyl3z@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I found out about the autism because I am autistic and I was considering New Zealand as a potential country to migrate to until I found out about that. I also found out about the plethora of other conditions that bar you from immigration but it started with my personal search.

I also wonder whether they measure the "burden on the healthcare system" in a fair or ableist/biased manner. Your link seems to suggest the former, but it also excludes ability to pay for private healthcare/insurance, which would preclude one from putting said burden on the public healthcare system and leaves the decision up to a medical professional, who may hold said biases, so...

[-] H4rdStyl3z@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago

It includes autism, which really enraged me when I found out. That's one less country in this already progressively anti-immigration world... Well two, because Australia does the same wrt autistic people (and likely other health conditions).

[-] H4rdStyl3z@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 months ago

Unless you think the point of feminism (for example) is to make men second class citizens. That’s just not a thing. It’s a rhetoric created by assholes to get ignorant people on board with their continued grossness.

I think there may be some radicals who genuinely wish for that, but those don't represent the entire movement and usually only pay lip service to the cause where it aligns with their personal beliefs. They should be ignored.

[-] H4rdStyl3z@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

Funny, but that's Bard AFAIK.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

H4rdStyl3z

joined 3 years ago