Which is the point. Voting third party won't fix the system, certainly not at the presidential level. So work with what you have now, and work towards something better in the areas where it's actually possible.

Doing something that demonstrably doesn't work isn't how you get what you want. If you want an option besides Democrats and Republicans, voting for someone else where those two options have a lock on winning does nothing besides vent some spleen.

I'm not saying doing nothing is the solution, or even voting for the two main parties is the solution, but doing something that has been shown to be completely ineffective is not the solution.

Well, that's terrible, sure, but do you know how much they spend in American arms purchases?!

Okay, you're sort if correct. He alluded to it. He mentioned the Russian Empire attacking various neighbors and taking over their territory using excuses of ethnicity and then referred to it as returning and reinforcing, not conquering. He then said it fell to their lot to return and reinforce, as well. Here's a link that discusses it. Given the date and the discussion, I'm sure you can find other sources for it. That was just the first that appeared on my search.

This isn't entirely incorrect, but this is pretty much what happened 10 years ago. And here we are. You can argue appeasement or suggest this is a one-time thing, but it's already the second time. Also, Putin has said he wants to rebuild the Soviet empire, so suggesting he will stop here on his own goes against his own statements.

Let's say a guy says he likes puppies, but then pays a pile of cash so some people will run a puppy-kicking machine. Would you say he likes puppies or not?

Isn't it at meme levels when YouTube games have their screen go black and they mention Nvidia crashing?

This reminds me of when I went to a restaurant with some friends and we had a variety of beers to taste. I'm not a big drinker, and have never liked beer, but whatever, it won't kill me. So we try 5 or 6, some are better and some are worse, but there's one that's far better than the rest. I say, "Well, this one is almost worth drinking," and they all respond with something along the lines of "Yeah, this one is really good." That's when I came to the conclusion that my perception of good and bad were on point for beer, it's just that my standard for what I was going to enjoy was higher. They can keep their beers, I'll stick to tastier beverages, alcoholic or otherwise.

Sabotage against an enemy in war is a long-held tradition, and can be a very effective tactic if it causes economic (or other) damage to their enemy. It will still cost less than rebuilding entire cities, but I guess that doesn't matter as much since it wasn't (scary hand gestures) sabotage.

I'll give you an upvote just for knowing what type of gem it was. So many South African diamond mine comments smh.

The whole idea of nuclear ICBM warfare and MAD is that you are prepared to launch at least some of your missiles before your attack capability can be removed. So, to maintain MAD capability, at least some of your missiles have to be launch capable at any time in order to effectively respond to a first strike. Of course, that readiness level can be increased if the perceived threat is higher. What that means is that a response strike needs to be able to launch in less than 30 minutes. Two hours is very generous. The first strike advantage is that you can launch most of your missiles. The MAD doctrine assures that all victories on this stage are pyrrhic.

Yes, the US constitution requires that the president be at least 35 and a natural born citizen. There is more info here.