sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago

https://annas-archive.org/volunteering

Be aware that helping Anna's Archive may be illegal, or even criminal.


A different, more legal archiving effort is the Archive Team. It focuses on public data on the internet. https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/ArchiveTeam_Warrior

In some places without a strong freedom of information tradition (like the EU), this may still be illegal.

54

We can only expect these trends to continue to worsen, and many works to be lost well before they enter the public domain.

We are on the eve of a revolution in preservation, but “the lost cannot be recovered.” We have a critical window of about 5-10 years during which it’s still fairly expensive to operate a shadow library and create many mirrors around the world, and during which access has not been completely shut down yet.

If we can bridge this window, then we’ll indeed have preserved humanity’s knowledge and culture in perpetuity. We should not let this time go to waste. We should not let this critical window close on us.

Let’s go.

  • Anna and the team
[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

While the possession and cultivation of marijuana are already banned in Japan, the country will prohibit its use as well, setting a prison sentence of up to seven years for violation.

Ok, so that clears that up.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

The boomers had cars and flexed being able to drive stick or know what a carburetor is, unlike those feeble Millennials. They had that greaser subculture. Hmm. I guess that makes the movie Grease the equivalent of War Games or Hackers.

So what is the zoomer thing? What eye-rolling help do they give to doddering old gen-Xers? What will they flex in their old age?

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Believing that animals are just like us s hardly and outlandish belief, on the facts. We're evolutionarily closely related. We have basically the same skeleton. Skull, spine, rib cage, hips, 4 extremities. Arms and legs go: 1 big bone, 2 smaller bones, and lotsa little bones. It looks to be the same with the brain.

We expect vegans not to blow up slaughterhouses or such. Fair enough. But expecting them to shut up about their beliefs is a bit much, no? Expecting them not to tell people how they feel, not to kiss in public, or hold a pride para... Sorry, wrong prosecuted minority.

I've heard these takes about vegans for literal decades now, and not once has an actual vegan popped up to tell me that I'm a murderer.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Ok, so that's why you're not making any sense. You have no idea what's going on.

Look, it's very simple. Vegans are a small, harmless minority. So some people bully them. Of course, it's their own fault. They wouldn't mind them if they weren't "out and proud". It's always the same story. There's almost no variation.

I thought you were saying that it's ok to bully them because they believe the wrong thing. That's what @redisdead is saying. He compares them to "right wing cunts" when they speak their beliefs. Fascis get bashis. Just like vegans, I guess.

Watch the company you keep.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

No, you cannot patent an ingredient. What you can do - under Indian law - is get "protection" for a plant variety. In this case, a potato.

That law is called Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001. The farmer in this case being PepsiCo, which is how they successfully sued these 4 Indian farmers.

Farmers' Rights for PepsiCo against farmers. Does that seem odd?

I've never met an intellectual property freak who didn't lie through his teeth.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Vegans believe that animals have the same rights to live as humans. A nazi believes that the "others" do not have the same right to live as "his people".

I don't think you'll be able to convince me that these are morally or ethically equivalent positions. But I see the point. They both believe the wrong thing. The out-group sucks. Yes, I know how humans tick.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Heh. Funny that this comment is uncontroversial. The Internet Archive supports Fair Use because, of course, it does.

This is from a position paper explicitly endorsed by the IA:

Based on well-established precedent, the ingestion of copyrighted works to create large language models or other AI training databases generally is a fair use.

By

  • Library Copyright Alliance
  • American Library Association
  • Association of Research Libraries
[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The copyright industry wants money. So, 4 legs good, 2 legs better. It's depressing to see how easily people are led around by the nose.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Ok, I understand. You don't like them because of their beliefs.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

At first, I was confused. Isn't the fact that you believe something the only justification for saying something? I mean, otherwise you'd be lying. But you're saying you disagree with the belief in the first place, right?

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

But that's unethical!

52

This was published in November 2023, but may be of general interest now, because of current events.

751

The key problem is that copyright infringement by a private individual is regarded by the court as something so serious that it negates the right to privacy. It’s a sign of the twisted values that copyright has succeeded on imposing on many legal systems. It equates the mere copying of a digital file with serious crimes that merit a prison sentence, an evident absurdity.

This is a good example of how copyright’s continuing obsession with ownership and control of digital material is warping the entire legal system in the EU. What was supposed to be simply a fair way of rewarding creators has resulted in a monstrous system of routine government surveillance carried out on hundreds of millions of innocent people just in case they copy a digital file.

25

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16327419

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16324188

The Mozilla Builders Accelerator funds and supports impactful projects that are vital to the open source AI ecosystem. Selected projects will receive up to $100,000 in funding and engage in a focused 12-week program.

Applications are now open!

June 3rd, 2024: Applications Open
July 8th, 2024: Early Application Deadline
August 1st, 2024: Final Application Deadline
September 12th, 2024: Accelerator Kick Off
December 5th, 2024: Demo Day
view more: next ›

General_Effort

joined 9 months ago