Its one of the dangling threads from around that time. Likely the truth is fully lost to history
Its true. He claims he was "somewhere in Texas" during the assassination. Its one of those events where everybody remembers where they were when they heard the news, but he does not.
I hear a lot of generalities here, but nothing specific.
Which "Leftists" are you talking about? What things are being "ignored" that Harris said? That the 101st is doing training exercises in the EU?
People had 4 years of Trump. He has a record, you can look at it. He's a lying politician now who made promises and never delivered. And after that debate it looks like the media may have been trying too hard to spin his faults, as they did with Biden.
Trump is well known to lie and take every position under the sun and nearby rocks, so saying things like "Trump doesn't want war" is basically nonsense psychic mind reading. Rather than cherry picking responses it makes more sense to look at a politician's actions in bulk. eg "What choices do they typically make?"
He bombed Syria, helped Saudi Arabia massacre people in Yemen and bombed an Iranian government official in Iraq in hopes of starting a war with Iran. These are not the actions of an anti war candidate.
Similarly saying "peacefully" once in a speech then following it with 10-20 "fight like hells" and similar over the next 50 minutes isn't really that convincing of an argument. If I told you to be peaceful once and told you to fight somebody 10-20 times, what would your takeaway be?
A jury convicted Trump, not E Jean Caroll. Her testimony was a piece, but again a jury takes into account things like the fact that he frequently used assaulting women in changing rooms as a routine he employed. He had statements suggesting assaulting women was just normal behavior for a celebrity.
If you want to cherry pick Trump's history that's fine, just know that everybody sees you lying to them and will see you as a liar.
hell yeah those guys fucking ripped shit up
I was thinking it was more to do with dancing, possibly even music. It could even be something really weird.
Usually the way to identify if its about hunting/war or not is to find the exceptions and links: do hunters that perform really, really well have 3x the visual cortex neurons? Is it a socialization thing where doing certain tasks results in higher brain differentiation?
There's a lot of questions
I get the desire to respond to current events but there's nothing wrong with being a bit curious about why people don't like the guy. Its weird to have so much grace for some random dude and none for the people criticizing him.
The media has sort of tossed him in with the "people who upset feminists" camp but like mostly its his "howto commit human trafficking" type videos that are generating criminal lawsuits.
don't compare Tate to Assange. Tate is a common criminal who is dumb enough to go on camera and made howto videos on human trafficking and then tried to sell them to kids.
The allegations surrounding tate are more extreme than epstein and he has many recorded instances of himself describing the methods. This is a case that in US court would probably be easier to prosecute.
nobody is excusing him - I'm pointing out there are lots of reports of police assaulting women. Its frequent enough most major US papers have an article on costs cities pay associated with settling these allegations.
they're rich AND a lot of people who should be arresting and prosecuting him have likely committed sex crimes themselves.
people forget it took 10+ years to put epstein in jail