sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run -3 points 1 month ago

Makes sense. Smart TVs weren't common at that point, now you can't avoid them.

[-] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, in which case you wouldn't accept the downtime and would drop the cash on redundant systems.

[-] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 6 points 1 month ago

I think this is just an excuse to delay it. I don't think there's that many big releases coming up this year.

[-] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 8 points 1 month ago

I mean disaster planning is about finding ways to mitigate things like power or internet going down to minimize or eliminate their impact. That said, accepting the risk of downtime because alternatives are too expensive is a perfectly valid decision as long as it's an intentional one.

[-] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run -1 points 1 month ago

15 year old game at this point

[-] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Could Jesus microwave a burrito so hot that not even he could eat it?

[-] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 61 points 1 month ago

"Review bomb" aka getting bad reviews.

[-] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 13 points 1 month ago

Primary candidates don't usually select a running mate before the primary anyways.

[-] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 24 points 1 month ago

Are you shocked that bad software can crash multiple operating systems or something?

[-] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 1 points 1 month ago

What you're asking for is a CI/CD pipeline that deploys a set of OS updates as a set revision. I don't the details on how to do it but that's the concept you're asking for.

[-] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 0 points 1 month ago

Use a CI/CD pipeline with a one box and preprod and run service integration tests after the update.

view more: next ›

FalseMyrmidon

joined 6 months ago