Unless my math is wrong, early September is only roughly 8 months from New Year's, not 9.

I use this as well. I haven't had any issues.

Is it just firing blindly? I can't make out anything that doesn't resemble something I'd see in the distance in Minecraft.

Depends on the hardware, but generally, yeah.

(It's a joke)

Thanks for the detailed explanation!

I'd be interested to see what people have to say regarding VR setup, but the Oculus gets little use anymore. I have a few games that were never ported to the newer, self-contained systems (I have a Quest 3), and we've downloaded a bunch of custom Beat Saber levels that I might feel bad about, but the sensors are a big enough pain to set up that I don't know that I'd feel that bad.

Truth. Full system would be easier.

I'm pretty sure anything of value is already backed up to my NAS. I'm just paranoid that my kids might freak out that I destroyed their state fair winning Scratch project or something.

I have an old (2017) Windows 10 box that is ineligible for Windows 11. Originally purchased to run my Oculus Rift, it now just streams YouTube and Twitch and plays some old Steam games and occasionally school related stuff (Lexia, Scratch, stuff like that).

I started thinking that, rather than worrying about an unsupported Windows OS on my network, I might upgrade to Mint or Ubuntu.

So, my question(s) is/are, how much of a hassle will such an upgrade be? Will I need to wipe the drive, or can I keep my files without having to back them up first? Can I run Windows games on Steam with Wine? Are there good 3D card drivers nowadays?

I'm reasonably versed in using Linux as a user, less so as an admin, in case that affects the way you answer.

"I will accept no contrary advice from my councilors, nor advisors, nor my people!" said no non-megalomaniac ever.

Boneheads. They initiated an entirely unnecessary conflict. They didn't see this as a possibility?

I mentioned the not reading the article so people would not waste their time citing facts from the article that may explain the headline that suggested billions social security numbers were leaked. I made no assumptions about missing addresses, as the headline didn't mention anything about missing addresses. I even mentioned that the event the article discussed was probably pretty bad -- definitely not a negative against the article's believability. I'm only guilty of judging a book by its cover, and in an existence of limited time, nobody has time to do any more than that except for limited exceptions. I did not choose to make this article an exception. The headline was mathematically deceptive, and my comment was about that. Nothing more.

If you see an article highlighting a breach of social security numbers and don't assume it's about the U.S., that's crazy to me.