Sure thing, troll ✌️

I'm not reading the manual of the Uber I'm about to climb into. A firefighter isn't going to read the manual of a car they're trying to pry me out of.

I DO read the manual on the Kia I actually drive. To read about the recommendations for the tires. To read about replacing fuses. To find the load hauling capacity. Not how to open the fucking door.

safety shouldn't influence artistic choice

Did you really just string those words together in all seriousness without a hint of irony? And that folks is exactly why we need the NHTSA.

A child isn't going to find that. A rescuer who isn't familiar with Teslas isn't going to be able to find that.

I couldn't even figure out how to open a fully functional door from outside the first time I got in a Tesla. I'm an adult who's been driving my entire life.

That's not innovation; it's a safety hazard for the sake of the aesthetics of a handle that doesn't stick out. I don't view that as a reasonable trade-off.

Those people also frustrate the hell out of my aunt with actual celiac disease. She's basically had to stop eating in restaurants because there's no real way for her to differentiate between "gluten-free" and "no, no really, we cooked all of this in a completely separate area of the kitchen with dedicated utensils that never come into contact with anything from the other side of the kitchen"

She has a couple of places she can trust, but just trying out new places for funsies is not a thing she could ever do.

It's illegal to ask you not to discuss wages in the United States. Violation of federal labor law.

Star Trek. It's a whole plotline with O'Brien

OP is in Denmark, so no recluse spiders there lol.

Better in 50 years than never

"Men are afraid women will laugh at them. Women are afraid men will kill them."

There's a reason Margaret Atwood was the person who pointed this out.

I'm on book 8, and if you can believe it gets even better. I'm a little speechless about it.

I mean, yes. People are stupid. That's why we have safety regulations. This court case is about a lack of safety regulations.

"Person watches X creative and clearly fictional content" is not analogous in any way to "person watches X video essay crafted to look like a documentary, but actually just full of lies and propaganda"

Don't be ridiculous