sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

It's cool but it's more or less just a party trick.

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How many times is this same article going to be written? Model collapse from synthetic data is not a concern at any scale when human data is in the mix. We have entire series of models now trained with mostly synthetic data: https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/model_doc/phi3. When using entirely unassisted outputs error accumulates with each generation but this isn't a concern in any real scenarios.

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Based on the pricing they're probably betting most users won't use it. The cheapest api pricing for flux dev is 40 images per dollar, or about 10 images a day spending $8 a month. With pro they would get half that. This is before considering the cost of the language model.

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

New record for most buzz words in a headline.

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Most of this seems true (or was at the time) but this is outdated now. Mr. Beast is no longer managed by Night Media.

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago

I feel like they should at least provide them with a laptop If they're going to do unpaid promotion.

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

The animation is flashy but the plot and storytelling can't even compare to the game.

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

What's the deal with Alpine not using GNU? Is it a technical or ideological thing? Or is it another "because we can" type distro?

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

The model does have a lot of advantages over sdxl with the right prompting, but it seems to fall apart in prompts with more complex anatomy. Hopefully the community can fix it up once we have working trainers.

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 61 points 3 months ago

On Discord, the black hole for useful information.

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

The names missing from the list say more about the board's purpose than the names on it.

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

The issue is that they have no way of verifying that. We'd have to trust 2 other companies in addition to DDG.

215

First, applicant argues that the mark is not merely descriptive because consumers will not immediately understand what the underlying wording "generative pre-trained transformer" means. The trademark examining attorney is not convinced. The previously and presently attached Internet evidence demonstrates the extensive and pervasive use in applicant's software industry of the acronym "GPT" in connection with software that features similar AI technology with ask and answer functions based on pre-trained data sets; the fact that consumers may not know the underlying words of the acronym does not alter the fact that relevant purchasers are adapted to recognizing that the term "GPT" is commonly used in connection with software to identify a particular type of software that features this AI ask and answer technology. Accordingly, this argument is not persuasive.

view more: next ›

BetaDoggo_

joined 1 year ago