Tx. Corrected the autocorrect indeed..

Tim Walz just said it in a speech. He called the behavior of maga and maga cultists weird. And it stuck.

It probably stuck because it's an apt description that they don't like. They have no shame, so trying to actually shame them does not work.. which is also weird. The unapologetical and blatant lying is weird.. the whole world watches these people and most thing.. what the fuck...

Say the user defending unnecessary monitoring of kids

I asked you WHY.. and you still have not answered. But at the same time attacked the tone of the message.

And if your viewpoint ignores Personal rights in favor of corporations stomping all over them you are by extension pro corp. It's your words not mine. But sure.

Go ahead and block me.. as I can't imagine any proper answer on WHY this behavior by schools and companies should be acceptable will ever come.

Edit: "it happened to me so it must be acceptable"... Is some Stockholm level stuff you should maybe discuss with a professional. It's the underlying reason abused kids become abusers.

That is not an explanation on why this is the case. Cowardly slinking away into the shadows is par for the course.

Just for thought:

• Is everyone free not to use them? (Does the school offer solutions for byod?)
• Can people afford to make another choice while at the same time being forced to use laptops?
• Is the type of monitoring reasonable and proportional?

I'll bet a dollar the answer to this all is NO.

The whole pro company schtick is getting old.

Like a constrictor, squeezing everywhere, untill you can't breathe.

Yeah, that's just weird. Either it's a managed device and can be used only with what is pre configured... Or the invasion of privacy is the goal. Creeping on kids... I'm in your PC reading your dm's...

The point was America started the war for self interest. The whole ordeal was an exercise in paying heaps of money to defense contractors. There was no clue what victory looked like. They should have just up and left after vin laden was killed.

Troll.. that is not an explanation on why.

And to show their guys.. "see Sergey .. this is how it's done.. we do it.. they do it.. it's normal".

What are we monitoring? How kids get dressed, if they pick their nose while using the computer?

Blocking sites does not require on device "monitoring". Locking down a machine does not require monitoring. So why this invasive level of monitoring.

No you did not. You just stated that this was the case. I'm asking why that is/should be acceptable.

Why is it normal to put monitoring software on?
Why does a 3rd party need to monitor it?
What are they monitoring that would be considered acceptable?

I honestly ask, because I can't think of any reason.

Or is this similar to "mass shootings are a fact of life"?