sorted by: new top controversial old
Climate scientists flee Twitter [to Mastodon] as hostility surges in c/technology@lemmy.world
Climate scientists flee Twitter [to Mastodon] as hostility surges in c/technology@lemmy.world
[-] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

REMINDER: THIS IS WHERE WE STARTED

MY POINT = PROVEN CORRECT

PLEASE KEEP MOVING THE GOALPOST

Climate scientists flee Twitter [to Mastodon] as hostility surges in c/technology@lemmy.world
[-] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

The paper wasn't retracted until 2010 lol. The point is that fraudulent papers can be published.

Still lmao.

This just shows the resilience of publishing, and the scientific community to fraud and [alleged] corruption

Uh... sure it does, buddy.

Those poor plants in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
[-] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Lol I despise people not knowing what a strawman is. Go back to english class.

Climate scientists flee Twitter [to Mastodon] as hostility surges in c/technology@lemmy.world
Climate scientists flee Twitter [to Mastodon] as hostility surges in c/technology@lemmy.world
[-] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Tell me more about how antivax scientists didn't successfully publish a paper with tons of biases and nonsensical findings.

Climate scientists flee Twitter [to Mastodon] as hostility surges in c/technology@lemmy.world
[-] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

No paper would be published if it was biased and as selective as you say.

That is incredibly naive of you and truly points to your lack of credibility.

AlexanderTheDead

joined 1 month ago