sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I think "cause" is a little bit of a strong word here unless there are studies I haven't seen. The studies I've read are about correlation between simulated gambling and problem gambling. A child who spends a lot of time on simulated casino games is more likely to problematic gamble as an adult - but that's not a causal link. The child could like the simulated gambling and real gambling because they were already predisposed to gambling in general.

The problem with loot boxes and micro-transactions tied to chance is they let kids actually problematic gamble. And this lootbox/real world money style of gambling is also correlated with problematic gambling in adulthood yet they're being left at mature instead of 18+. It really doesn't make sense treating simulated only gambling harsher.

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Read the article, they mean both.

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

While I'm happy they're doing something, they got it backwards. In my opinion games that have simulated gambling but don't take any real world money should be mature (age 15 suggested) or even unregulated, and games that have real world money that control an element of chance should be 18+ (legally required).

Here's some games/series that would be 18+ if released under this law: Pokemon Red and Blue, Ni No Kuni, Knights of the Old Republic, Witcher, Yakuza, Fallout New Vegas, Dragon Quest, Final Fantasy, Fable, Mass Effect, Jade Empire, many more.

Simulated gambling isn't really a problem it's the real world money tied to elements of chance that's the problem.

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

I'm doing my part by writing really shitty foss projects for AI to steal and train on.

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

You don't jam out to Linus and Lucy while watching presidential debates?

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 94 points 1 week ago

Should be banned everywhere smh. It's crazy that people are just chucking lithium into the garbage for no reason...when vapes started as an easily reusable setup in the firth place.

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

For those who don't care, it's an emulator.

For those that do care, it's not trying to emulate the actual hardware of the xbox one it's just translating system calls to work on normal Windows PCs. WINE, the inspiration for the name, stands for WINE IS NOT AN EMULATOR so they probably didn't want to call it one. But you could call it high level emulation if you want.

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Bro still out here overhyping, he can't help himself.

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Yup, I don't go to any price gouged concerts period. I can afford it but I refuse on principle because more than $50 just isn't worth it for me to see any artist so I mostly just see moderately big names when they play open stages at festivals. On the other hand traditionally "high class" music like symphony orchestras still have tickets in the $20 dollar range.

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

type site:lemmy.world in front of your search if using google. You can combine multiple instances with the OR operator ie site:lemmy.world OR site:programming.dev this will force google to give you content only from your desired domains but lemmy.world posts will likely trample the other instances for a lot of stuff.

We're becoming a little centralized (which I personally don't find to be such a bad thing yet).

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

It's non just Facebook either. Every big tech social media platform has headed in this direction of showing you stuff you don't really want to see based on maximizing profit. For-profit social media seems to mostly be doomed to this outcome because it makes more money.

view more: next ›

2pt_perversion

joined 1 year ago