22
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 48 points 11 months ago

Ask a doctor not the internet.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

I want a second opinion.

Ok, that's an ugly shirt.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
[-] xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink 38 points 11 months ago

This would be you:

(Extra Fabulous Comics)

[-] adj16@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Lmao excellent reference

[-] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago

Why the hell would you do that?

Looks like ~4000IU a week is plenty, even with no sunlight exposure.

You're looking at like 13x the recommended intake; that's going to screw up your calcium levels eventually. And the stuff is cumulative, it's not like eg. vitamin C, which is gone from your system a day later.

My very strong advice would be don't.

If you've got a massive deficiency, follow medical advice.

If you haven't, then quit fucking with it.

[-] Thavron@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago

Why the hell would you do that?

I had to do exactly this after a blood test showed my vit D was so low they couldn't accurately test it. It was to bring it back up to level, and now I just take a normal amount every day to keep it that way.

[-] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Oh yeah, Stoss therapy - german for 'hammer' :D

I just wonder why someone would continue to do it...

[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 9 points 11 months ago

The German word for hammer is Hammer.

Stoß is push or shove

[-] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That makes a lot more sense, come to think.

TIL my kid's paediatrician couldn't speak german either :D

[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

Ah well they tried hahaha

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

We were more of a "schlepp(en)" family

[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

I dont get it :S

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago

Had to do the same a few years ago

It was quite the trip suddenly having my vitamin D levels go from dangerously low to normal in such a short span

Especially after mine had been so low for so long

[-] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

Did you have symptoms from low vitamin d, and how long did they take to resolve?

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago

Vitamin D has a big impact on emotions, and in my case I felt nothing emotionally.

Like literally nothing

It took a few weeks to feel normal again but that first week it was like all my emotions got turned up to 11 and because it had been so low for so long I had little to no control of those emotions.

I was a damn emotional wreck for that first week and a bit of a wreck in the following weeks.

[-] Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sweden's recommendations are 100 µg/day for adult, which is 4000 IU (IE) per day. Times 7, is 28000 per week. So you're off by a factor of 7.

Some tests have shown even up to 10000 per day is fine. But why risk it? While I'd not take OPs 50000 per week, because it's too much in my eyes, it could still be save, but I'd personally not risk it. There's no point in overdoing it.

I take 5000 UI every other day,, because I barely get any sunlight. Probably a bit too low but I'd rather not risk it.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Might just copy your scheme here

[-] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

It is for some people. I currently need to take 100k iu/week in order to be on the low end of normal.

I was on 150k iu, but I had to switch doctors. The new idiot didn't believe me and just told me take an OTC pill a day.

I left that guy. The next time I got checked, I was in the single digits. The new one didn't really believe me either. Each winter visit I've been low and she just keeps adding another pill. I suspect I'll be back up to 150k then.

[-] Mothra@mander.xyz 12 points 11 months ago

Get a blood test. Excess of vitamin D may end up causing stones in your kidneys. If your levels aren't low, there is no point in adding a supplement.

[-] calhoon2005@aussie.zone 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That seems a bit too much. Why were you taking that much anyways?

https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/expert-answers/vitamin-d-toxicity/faq-20058108#:~:text=The%20main%20consequence%20of%20vitamin,the%20formation%20of%20calcium%20stones.

60,000 IU daily for a few months was shown to cause toxicity.

Edit - misread post, thought OP said daily intake, not weekly.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Ya no its per week, not day.

[-] calhoon2005@aussie.zone 2 points 11 months ago

Ah yes. I misread that. Ignore me then.

[-] CreateProblems@corndog.social 8 points 11 months ago

When my vitamin D levels were tested low, the doc told me to take 2,000 IBU daily.

~7000/day seems quite high to me. But I'm not a doctor.

I would consider if the cost of purchasing all this vitamin D - a lot of of which your body may be excreting rather than absorbing - is a worthwhile financial investment in your health. I don't know anything about you, maybe it is.

[-] PurpleTentacle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Unlike e.g. vitamin C, excess vitamin D isn't really excreted. It's stored long term and eventually causes hypercalcemia and kidney stones if persistently supplemented at high doses over a long time. OP's dosage is above the "sensible if you never see the sun" range but not quite in the "dangerously excessive" range.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Can you clarify if you think this could work or do you legit perceive it as harmful. I also supplement with K2

[-] PurpleTentacle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Can you maybe clarify what you mean with "work"? What are you trying to achieve by significantly exceeding any supplemental recommendation that I've ever heard of?

Are you worried, that your Vitamin D3 levels are significantly too low, because you're suffering e.g. from SAD, another mood- or an autoimmune disorder?

Talk to your doctor, get your levels checked, follow their advice and take the dose they recommend for the time they recommend!

Are you planning to relocate to a cave? Will you never see the sun again?

Talk to a medical professional about that plan, take whatever supplements they recommend for as long as they recommend them.

Are you living in a cold and dark country like Sweden? Then that country probably has safe guidelines you can follow. If you're still worried or you are experiencing any symptoms that might be related to low Vitamin D3 levels, talk to a medical professional!

Why are you trying to exceed any recommended dosage by the factor of 10? Where did you get that number in the first place?

I believe that number is still low enough to not pose any immediate risk in the short or mid term. Your doctor might even agree that high supplementation is necessary to get your level up.

As a long term plan and without knowing your actual levels, it's just stupid: At best it does nothing but waste your money on needless supplements. At worst it increases the risks that come with overdosing on Vitamin D3.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I probably should get my levels bloodtested

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Probably more wasteful than anything. Vitamin D3 is pretty safe, and that's not a crazy dose for a serious deficiency. It's probably worth getting tested for your level and dropping to about half that if you aren't low.

[-] Mothra@mander.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

Excess of vD for a prolonged time can get you stones in your kidneys. Hypercalcaemia

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Hopefully I didn't damage the 'kids too much.

[-] Granixo@feddit.cl 1 points 11 months ago
[-] ezjohnson@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

That is a perfectly reasonable amount of vitamin D to take weekly. If taken orally not all of it will be absorbed anyway.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I was of the understanding that D3 is lipophillic to the extent that it would likely just be absorbed into and leeched from fat over time. I'm not well read on the literature

[-] ezjohnson@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Before vitamin D can be stored in fat it must first be absorbed from the digestive system into the bloodstream. The absorbtion efficiency varies by individual but no one absorbs 100%. After making it into the blood some excess vitamin D can be stored in fat cells for later use.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
22 points (76.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43399 readers
626 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS