73
submitted 1 year ago by Mubelotix@jlai.lu to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Metaright@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

YouTube might be the biggest challenge yet given the extraordinary amount of storage needed to recreate it.

[-] simple@lemmy.mywire.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Its also getting the content creators onto the new platform. Thats a bigger challenge I think, without creators it's a dead site really, and making videos is significantly more difficult than image or text posting.

For storage, if we assume the format would be WebM at 1080p, 60fps and 20 minutes in length, it turns out to about 1GB. Even a cheap VPS instance usually offer 50GB of storage (with not too expensive storage upgrades).

So if its distributed evenly, we can host a good bit of videos (nothing compared to YouTube though).

[-] Norgur@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Let's not forget that there's money to be earned by being a youtube person. Creating a model that would make this possible in a federated approach would be bonkers as hell and probably just invite predatory dipshits who then lure creators with seemingly good offers and then start to hold them hostage in ways YouTube hasn't dared so far.

[-] Stormy404@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

good. i don't want capitalist advertising bs on the internet anyway.

[-] Kichae@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Most professional YouTubers survive primarily off of Patreon support and sponsored videos. YouTube ads provide only a small fraction of what they earn. If they could increase their Patreon or sponsorship income by cross-posting to PeerTube, then they could be enticed to do so. The current issue there is that sponsors are going to want accurate analytics, and PeerTube isn't going to be able to offer the kind of depth of audience analysis that YouTube can.

The problem is, the cost of hosting videos -- both in terms of storage and in terms of bandwidth -- is kind of prohibitive. That part needs to be solved.

[-] dreikelvin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Someone needs to invent middle-out compression and install it on a network of smart fridges

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Couldn't get past the third season of that show. Got too repetitive. Is it worth finishing?

[-] aluminium@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not to mention the computing to re-encode stuff for different framerates and resolution

[-] irmoz@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, no. The deaths of those websites have not happened yet, and when they do, the Fediverse will not be the one holding the scythe

[-] erogenouswarzone@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Right, it'll be death by suicides.

Google should probably be on there too. Can't find anything either non-corporate or irrelevant these days.

I was looking for js libraries that extended the ecma array prototypes, Google gave me a billion pages about how to use the ecma array prototypes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JshKlsn@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I literally have like 1TB of video stored on YouTube and privatized. Google is making $0 from my videos, but they still have to store them and have them available if I want to watch it (it's all of my Twitch VODs). Meanwhile websites like Streamable perma-delete my 5MB video after it gets 0 views in 2 milliseconds.

YouTube is a behemoth that will not be replaced.

[-] Andrzej@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

I mean you're right that YouTube isn't going anywhere, but they're going to either delete that data or start charging you for it at some point

[-] JshKlsn@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I'm shocked they haven't already. A good 95% of YouTube could be deleted and no one would notice, and would save Google millions and millions of dollars.

[-] bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

If they did that, I wouldn't be able to find a fix for the fuel line getting kinked in my BG86 leaf blower. You know that video with 48 views that exactly solves the problem I am having? Same applies across basically every niche device or mechanical issue and is one of the primary reasons I find myself on youtube.

[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Mastadon, Searx, Fediverse, and so on aren't killing or replacing the sites they're modeled after, not even close. They're just providing a privacy focused alternative for those who don't want to whored out by corporations or abused by powermods or shitty business decisions

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ThePac@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

lol reddit is still kicking, people. Don't count your chickens yet.

[-] Necronomicommunist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So is Facebook and Twitter. This meme is premature in triplicate.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

All while the fediverse still has low numbers.

I like the concept, but if your only selling point is "it's like email, you can use any instance" it's not going to be popular to most people.

[-] CrateDane@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago

Moreover, killing Youtube will be harder than killing any of these social media. Serving video content is very expensive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] redditcuntsz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You people are delusional. You are living in a fantasy.

[-] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

High five for those into fantasy!!

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I frankly don't see a way for federated video to happen unless uploads are severely limited or it's paywalled. Even with YouTube's wild compression, you're looking at several gigs for a single 4k video.

Honestly the fact that YouTube exists is a miracle. Video is still just monstrously large.

[-] GTG3000@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

Well, time to switch to watching Nebula?

I can't see how it will work for small-time creators though. Or for people who just want to show a video online.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I love nebula too. They're definitely what I imagine federated video would be though. Restricted uploads, and paid. Nothing wrong with that though, video is expensive.

[-] GTG3000@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

Well, one question is how it'd be paid for. You can't really have a federated payment provider, can you?

So would you have to pay for each separate server somehow, gathering them up like streaming service subscriptions?

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

You can’t really have a federated payment provider, can you?

Not to sound like a crypto bro, but this is literally the biggest benefit of cryptocurrencies, easy transfer of money between people wallet to wallet, and you can choose your exchange to exchange the money between crypto and cash.

Unfortunately crypto bros absolutely ruined crypto for everything it could've been

[-] GTG3000@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's fair.

[-] Stan@lemmywinks.com 0 points 1 year ago

Is size really the issue though? I can torrent more than I can store on my hard drives.

Seems like you could build a video streaming service on that. (Actually I think some people already did this.)

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

Lbry does exactly this. Actually it works way better than the last time I checked it out. I'm guessing they have invested in a centralized storage solution because I'm encountering basically no missing videos and extremely fast playback which wasn't the case the last time I checked them out a few years ago

[-] RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I would love a decentralized TikTok replacement. Aside from everybody's privacy complaints, TikTok has a really addictive delivery model.

I would think that short video clips would be easier to federate than beefy 4k video files.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] philluminati@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

There's an alternative to YouTube? There's a defederated Facebook?

[-] sol@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

Peertube already exist. If you have to upload a video to show someone on the internet it's already more convenient than youtube as you don't have to login and access with google accounts.

[-] NeroToro@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So for twitter it's mastodon, for reddit it's lemmy, for youtube odysee maybe, but what is it for facebook?

[-] alsivx@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

Mastodon -> Twitter

Friendica -> Facebook

Pixelfed -> Instagram

Lemmy/kbin -> Reddit

PeerTube -> Youtube

Owncast -> Twitch

FunkWhale/Castopod -> Music/Podcast

BookWyrm -> Goodreads

WriteFreely -> Blog

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ruapho@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

No money to make on the fediverse => no (expensive to create) content.

[-] EqMinMax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Twitter - mastodon
Reddit - lemmy
What for facebook?

[-] Kristof12@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Facebook? New for me

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Video is literally the data elephant in the room. I think we'll need AI to assist in developing something that demanding in terms of bandwidth. Remember, Youtube just works. No one is going to move to a platform where a video takes 30-60 seconds to load a video and a half an hour to upload a video when a practically instant option exists.

And I may be in the minority here, but so far, Google has been the least nefarious tech giant to my eyes. They haven't given me adequate reason to disavow them. I'm not saying they're good, I'm just saying they're not Musk Twitter, Zuck Meta, or the like. They don't obfuscate the fact that they sell your data like Meta, and they even understand the value of open source software, rare for a publically traded capitalist corporation. This will probably change, greed rot is universal, and they do treat their creators like dogshit on YouTube. But I'd be shocked if it was reasonably replacable by distributed enthusiasts given current infrastructure and bandwidth pricing. Estimates have Youtube's video data to be around 300 Petabytes, or 300,000 terabytes.

[-] nickavem@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Really? I'd say Apple is the least nefarious. They sell products to customers, they do not sell customers' attention.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Least nefarious ≠ good. Alphabet is still a publicly traded corporation at heart, and they have a legal obligation to their shareholders to turn a profit by any means necessary.

Don't forget that they got rid of their "Don't be Evil" motto.

[-] gon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I REALLY want there to be a better YT replacement on the fediverse or in some form of decentralized way.

As people are pointing out, videos are very large files, and therefore very expensive to host. The fediverse can mitigate this a little bit, as everyone can host their own videos on their own server, but that's not enough, and extremely inconvenient.

I do wonder if the blockchain/torrents can be used here... I'm not a dev or anything so IDK how any of it really works, but I think something to that tune is gonna be the only way, since traditional servers don't seem to be viable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheTechNerd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I think you can replace all social media with a decentralized version, except YouTube. Reason is cost and monetization.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
73 points (97.4% liked)

Memes

45189 readers
1364 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS