People should really stop doing that kind of bullshit. If you didn't like the remake post your opinion somewhere, but trying to falsify others scores is a douche move.

Of course it's forever-toddlers throwing a tantrum about "woke" again.

God forbid the vast majority of normal people don't agree with whatever pathetic rationalisation they have ended up with in their gullible little minds.

Never got that. A remake and its original counterpart can co-exist - one doesn't make the other worse or the other way around. What's the issue?

Point of clarification: the article was semi-protected, and "locked" is an oversimplistic description of it (understandable, since a lot of people who report on Wikipedia don't really understand how it works). Technically there's a way to lock a page such that only the Wikimedia Foundation staff can edit it, but realistically, full protection (i.e. only administrators and those above them can edit it) is probably the closest thing to a proper "lock" that ever gets used.

Semi-protection (the grey lock with a little person in it) just means that you need to be autoconfirmed (technically confirmed works too, but that system is basically disused). If you're autoconfirmed, that means you've made at least 10 edits on Wikipedia and your account is at least 4 days old – an extremely low bar to clear that largely keeps out spam from IP addresses and sockpuppet accounts. The semi-protection on this article is set to expire in three days.

There's also extended protection (the blue lock with an 'E' on it) that you'll generally see on highly contentious topics such as ultra-high-profile political figures, enormously contentious disputes between nations (Russia–Ukraine, Israel–Palestine, and India–Pakistan, to name a few), and then some miscellaneous ones like 'Atlantic Records' and 'Whopper' (the latter was because Burger King launched an ad which is designed to trigger your Android device to read out the first part of the Wikipedia article, making it red meat for vandals). This requires an account to have at least 500 edits and be at least 30 days old.

The silent hill wiki folks sure are a rowdy bunch. This one's pretty tame for them though, it's decidedly lacking in rants about circumcision.

This is why we don’t have nice things

Aren't people bored of constantly being upset?

Why? The original didn't go anywhere, and they're just screwing us out of possible remakes my faking bad press. So far, I've heard that they knocked it out of the park and I hope it's true. ~~Give me my SH4 remake~~

Gmers being Gmers

I bet none of the little shits even played the original. They probably think Pyramid Head was just the town's old executioner. And not the personification of James guilt over his unhealthy view of women.

Aside from wiki drama seems like a bunch of nothing with good reviews from Steam and it seeming to not have any drama people would be aware of if it wasn't for the article. Without it people wouldn't know about the wiki stuff with how quickly it was dealt with.

Not seeing any drama on /r/silenthill too.

I don't know what it is, with this need to shit on every single movie or game before it even comes out. There are people who cheer for this stuff to fail, it's absurd . It goes hand in hand with this other issue, when a game is released people will either love it or be called "unplayable shit". Nobody has an in between anymore. Just cause some games aren't a 10/10 masterpiece, it doesn't mean they're shit.

I get why some people are mad at the facial changes, I personally think it’s unnecessary, but if the game is good who cares. But making up false reviews to bring down a game just because you disagreed with how they handled something is crazy.

Woke is when I cant jerk to every women in a game discussing toxic male behaviors.