would it be simpler for people if we said "server" instead of "instance"? (programming.dev)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Die4Ever@programming.dev to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/3658116

or maybe some other terminology would be better? lots of people get confused when you ask them to choose an instance, sometimes I think even the word "proxy", "host", or "hub" is simpler

the specific terms aren't my point, just a discussion to see if we can come up with a better name

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 11 months ago

I think Discord actually is destroying meaning of "server" for many people. It should be called "communities" or "guilds". Server is not an abstract division between communities, but an actual machine serving and processing data, so you really can't create a Discord server unless you reverse engineer their code.

[-] nix@merv.news 0 points 11 months ago

i know discord servers are run on your own servers but us using the term would both be accurate and be understandable by the average person.

[-] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago

No, calling Discord groups/communities/guilds "servers" is not accurate and is totally wrong. You cannot create your own Discord server and Discord would never let you.

It's like calling Facebook a website hosting, because you can create a "site" on it.

[-] quicklime@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I haven't been on FB for several years, but ugh there was a while in the late 2010s when so many people over there were referring to FB groups as sites and just arghh arrghh aaarrgghhh.