222

OC: Me since Bun 1.0.0 (programming.dev)

submitted 1 year ago by starman@programming.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] dreadedsemi@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

Oh no. Another thing to learn.

[-] Solemarc@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

you probably don't need to learn it, Deno was a massive upgrade over Node and it didn't matter, not convinced this will be any different.

[-] nonearther@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

IMO, deno's approach was bad as it was reinventing the wheel, so one had to relearn. And then they brought package.json which they said they wouldn't. This again got people to unlearn and relearn things.

Bun, on the other hand, acts like what Typescript is to Javascript. It's just feels like superset of Node, instead of completely different tool.

I expect Bun will get more success than Deno.

[-] snowe@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

Makes sense. Deno was created by the same person that created node. They’re both going to be terrible, especially when they ignore everything ever discovered in software engineering about writing good code, good frameworks, good languages, etc.

[-] sip@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago

deno was also created by one of the guys who created node.

[-] snowe@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

huh? that's what I said.

[-] sip@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

sorry, brainfart. I read "bun is created as the same who created node" 🤦🏻‍♂️

[-] snowe@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

gotcha. I don't think bun is created by the same person that created node. deno is, and has just as bad a design as node as a result. it honestly baffling that people trust someone to write a language who failed so badly to write a language that they set back the entire world for decades to come.

[-] sip@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

idk I think people can learn from their mistakes and evolve. especially if they accept collaboration and RFCs.

I haven't worked much with deno, so I can't tell. But I earn my living with Node and it's ok. I dislike js way more than node itself.

I guess all the hate is around module resolution and package management.

[-] sip@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

idk I think people can learn from their mistakes and evolve. especially if they accept collaboration and RFCs.

I haven't worked much with deno, so I can't tell. But I earn my living with Node and it's ok. I still hate js more than node itself.

[-] starman@programming.dev 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's almost 100% compatible with node but faster. A lot faster. So no need to learn anything but few cli commands. For example bun run dev instead of npm run dev.

Edit: website

[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Alias npm bun level compatibility?

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Bun is designed as a drop-in replacement for Node.js

It does seem so!

[-] beeb@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I'm trying to get my work to switch to bun but we have packages in a private AWS codeartifact repo. Does it support this? I tried to use it with our npmrc file but it couldn't install those packages.