495
submitted 1 year ago by d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Alternatively, if your current phone doesn't have a headphone jack, do you wish it did?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OrangeJoe@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Sympathy? What a dumb take.

People still have wired headphones that still work perfectly fine. We used to be able to use them directly with our phones. We also had the option of using wireless too if we wanted. The option was removed, so now in order to keep using some of still perfectly fine electronics with our phones, it requires adapters. That's annoying. What is the benefit to me as a consumer now that the jack is gone? Some marketing bullshit about weight or cost savings? I don't buy it. Phones are larger than ever and more expensive than ever.

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's half an argument to be made about waterproofing, but it kinda falls flat when the waterproofing we get isn't that good.

"This phone is IP68 rated!"

Oh cool, so I can go swimming with it and take it into the shower?

"Haha, no."

Great, so glad we gave up a ton of features for this.

[-] HeckGazer@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

Don't let yourself be gaslit by anti right to repair and apple propaganda. We had a smartphone with removable battery and headphone jack that you could swim with, it has been done. The water resistance argument does not hold water, at all.

[-] June@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

That and headphone jacks were able to be made waterproof pretty easily too. It does introduce a new area for potential incursion, but it’s pretty minimal for the vast majority of users.

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
495 points (93.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43399 readers
1178 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS