55
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Anissem@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

So the work I do is 100% remote now. I moved to Southern California because of an industry that has in part moved to remote work. My only requirements are a temperate climate, nature access and hopefully a blue-ish state. Is there a place out there that makes sense financially? I’m hoping to buy a house less then 500k. I don’t need access to large cities as I honestly don’t do anything. The only requirement I can think of is access to solid internet as I stream full screen video for what I do.

I’m currently looking at Michigan and Virginia as options.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JimmyDean@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

The biggest downside of late in my opinion has been the homelessness and mentally unwell / drug abuse issues. Measure 110's decriminalization of hard drugs without actually having sufficient treatment options available just exacerbated existing problems. Rural areas have a lot less of this but you're almost guaranteed to see some nasty stuff if you're in the bigger cities.

A lot of people do take advantage of taxes around here. There's no sales tax in Oregon so people from Vancouver just drive over one of the bridges to do their shopping.

[-] Anissem@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Corbett looks nice, the yearly average temps look good. Would you say that’s a more rural option? I’m looking for something outside any major city, I don’t go anywhere honestly.

[-] invno1@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

You might like Hood River. It's a little more of an established town with grocery stores and many breweries/shops/outdoor activities.

[-] Anissem@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

My brother in law may be involved in this as he seems to think there’s tax advantages to living on the Oregon / Washington border. Would you say this is true? It’s not like I buy a lot of stuff, am I crossing the border for groceries? Trying to see what he’s seeing.

[-] fryday@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago

The main tax advantage there would only apply if you lived in Washington and drove to Oregon for significant purchases (cars, electronics, potentially groceries, whatever makes up the bulk of your spending). This is because Oregon doesn't have sales tax and Washington doesn't have income tax (Oregon has some of the highest income taxes in the nation, depending on your tax bracket, 4.75-9.9% per nerdwallet. Property taxes are roughly the same at the state level.

If you're thinking about moving because you have free agency and want to get the most bang for your buck, considering tax burdens of places you're looking at should definitely be a data point, since that can make a big financial difference depending on your lifestyle, spending habits, and future income.

[-] Anissem@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
55 points (88.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43404 readers
909 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS