1352
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] atmur@lemmy.world 65 points 6 days ago

For as much as Linux nerds (myself absolutely included) complain about distros like Ubuntu and Manjaro, I'd still take either one over Windows or MacOS any day.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 28 points 6 days ago

Mac OSX isn't bad... so long as you sell it your soul, and don't want freedom in return, it's great ๐Ÿ‘.

I kid... mostly - it's iOS that is horrifying, but Mac OSX is still Unix (tho not GNU), so not anywhere within leagues of Microdick.

And - possibly dumb question - couldn't you always just run a Linux VM at near-native speed, and get the benefits of both?

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago

couldn't you always just run a Linux VM at near-native speed, and get the benefits of both?

The obvious downside is that Linux is no longer the host OS. MacOS or Windows would be closed source code managing your hardware. And any VM could only be as fast as the host OS allows it to be.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 4 days ago

The host OS is likewise limited, but more by hardware, so it might be a small performance tradeoff, depending on whether, as you brought up, you need Linux to be ultimately in control rather than to simply run some software.

So that would not always work, ofc... but it sometimes would!:-)

load more comments (42 replies)
load more comments (50 replies)
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
1352 points (96.8% liked)

linuxmemes

20707 readers
1563 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS