597
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

It turns out that the easiest thing to program isn't always the best application design.

[-] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I would argue that elegance and being easy to program are virtues by themselves, because it makes code easy to understand and easy to maintain.

A one-to-one string to filename mapping is straightforward and elegant. It's easy to understand ("a filename is a unique string of characters"), it makes file name comparisons easy (a bit level compare suffices) and as long as you consistently use the case that you intend, it doesn't behave unexpectedly. It really is the way of the least surprise.

After all, case often does have meaning, so why shouldn't it be treated as a meaningful part of a filename? For example: "French fries.jpg" could contain a picture of fries specifically made in France, whereas "french fries.jpg" could contain a picture of fries made anywhere. Or "November rain.mp3" could be the sound of rain falling in the month of November, whereas "November Rain.mp3" is a Guns N' Roses song. All silly examples of course, but they're merely to demonstrate that capitalization does have meaning, and so we should be able to express that canonically in filenames as well.

[-] redisdead@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

It's not elegant when it causes more problems than it solves.

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
597 points (90.2% liked)

linuxmemes

20707 readers
1710 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS