477
submitted 2 weeks ago by kalkulat@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

But how do you apply this with Lorentz' transformation (i.e. relativistic factors)? You cannot approach the speed of light without considering relativism. It is known that p = gamma * m * v where p is momentum, gamma is the gamma factor given by sqrt(1/(1 - (v^2/c^2))), m is mass and v is velocity. If you study the gamma factor, you'll realize that it approaches infinite as v approaches c, the speed of light. Since we are actually dealing with light here, where v = c we are breaking the equation. Momentum cannot be defined for any mass which moves at the speed of light. It's asymptotic at that speed.

Also note that the same goes for E = mc^2. At relativistic speeds, also this equation needs to consider the gamma factor. So those classical equations break down for light.

The answer is that photons don't have mass, but they have energy. There is a good explanation a bit further up in this thread on how this is possible.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The one that you multiply with gamma is the rest mass, not the total mass.

To be short, p = m_0 * γ * v, where m_0 is the rest mass. Put that in your equation and look what happens.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
477 points (99.8% liked)

science

14338 readers
641 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS