1
Those poor plants (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

hey vegans, cool fact, plant based diets are vastly more efficient and effective at feeding people than meat based diets.

Meat consumes plants to exist, most of that energy is lost. Not so much with plants.

Just start telling people this shit lmao. Who cares about morality when you can pretend to be saving the environment instead.

[-] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Cool, but steak is my favorite animal.

true, cows are my favorite food.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Boobs are my favorite source of entertainment.

Wait... Nope, nothing to do with sustenance

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

nothing to do with sustenance

You think? I'm pretty sure that's the purpose of boobs.

i thought it was for us to legislate female top wear?

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

It's the:

Jiggle jiggle,

Wobble wobble,

Pop pop, and a swabble dobble.

Jump twice and wiggle, we be

Bringing back the twist

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 1 month ago

You think they don't? And environmentalism is also morality.

environmentalism is morality sure, but doesn't it seem silly to use an appeal to morality to push for more morality.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I'm no vegan but that's a common vegan talking point

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

It is, but many vegans also do really unhelpful things that are closer to trying to berate or shame people into not eating meat and it is obviously not effective.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Out of curiosity, how many people have you convinced to go vegan?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

None. Why do I have to convince a single person to criticize an argument I don't think is convincing?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Well, I guess I'm just not sure why you're trying to give us advice about something you have zero experience with.

If I didn't know better, I'd say that you don't actually care what kind of approach is more convincing, and you're just trying to tell us to shut up, or say things in a way that makes us easy to ignore.

You have no idea what you're talking about at best, and realistically, you don't even want us to be successful. So, thank you for your unsolicited advice on which tacts are unhelpful, but, just so you know, I will be promptly tossing it into the trash.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I have a lot of experience with people trying to convince me of things.

And you are welcome to take the advice I didn't give to you in the first place and throw it in the trash.

I have a lot of experience with people trying to convince me of things.

how much experience do you have with people convincing you of things?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

but much of the plant matter that animals eat is grazed or waste from some other agricultural product.

[-] Cypher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

TBF land clearance for grazing land is a catastrophic issue for the environment and going on in places like the Amazon rainforest.

Some ecosystems are naturally evolved to supporting grazing species like the grasslands of North America which was once home to millions of Buffallo but that's not true of most land currently used for grazing.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

land clearance for grazing land is a catastrophic issue for the environment and going on in places like the Amazon rainforest.

absolutely. I have some ideas about what to do about it, but none of them involve buying beans

[-] Cypher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

It's at a point where I'm all for a UN resolution to end land clearance in locations like the Amazon Rainforest, to be enforced by lethal means if necessary.

Billions of lives may depend on securing such important ecosystems.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

I don't have any influence with the un.

[-] Cypher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Haha not saying you do but it’s what I would like to see happen

[-] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 0 points 1 month ago

The UN doesn't even have any influence with the UN. Even if I supported lethal enforcement of environmental protections (which I do in many cases), the UN's idea of enforcement is a kindly-worded letter. If the USA doesn't back something the UN has no power. And the USA is one of literally only two countries in the entire world that don't recognize access to healthy food as a human right.

that can be true, but we also grow a substantial amount of feed for agriculture usage, even if it's not local to us. A lot of alf alfa being grown is exported.

It's all dependent on whatevers cheapest at the end of the day. And regardless of this fact, a lot of energy is still lost in this process, cows are a significant contributor to climate change, ironically.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

all of agriculture is only about 20% of our GHG emissions. cows are a fraction of that.. there are definitely bigger issues.

as for the alfalfa, it's also a small fraction of global crops. 2/3 of all crop calories go to humans with only 1/3 going to livestock.. this includes about 70% of the weight of the global soy crop (after we have pressed it for oil), as well as fodder like corn stalks. we basically fed livestock trash and get food. it's a pretty good deal.

all of agriculture is only about 20% of our GHG emissions. cows are a fraction of that… there are definitely bigger issues.

obviously, but in terms of livestock, cows are pretty significant.

30% of all global stock going to feed is a pretty large percentage of global crop production.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

I think it's probably fine. it will work itself out when the workers of the world organize as a class, take possession of the means of production, abolish the wage system, and live in harmony with the Earth.

[-] aniki@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago

We don't base policy on some chuds thoughts

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm quoting the iww constitution, so I don't know what chud you're talking about

i think it's a lot more likely to work out better in a highly decentralized system, i'm not much of a commie myself personally, as i prefer to live outside the bounds of normalcy, and unless i get a lot of say in the commie meetings i'm not sure i can justify existing in that society lol.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

the iww encourages your autonomy

[-] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There was a good discussion of this on Reddit recently. Sorry to link to Reddit, but it's a good, topical post worth perusal.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Agriculture/comments/1dv7fw9/how_much_good_land_is_used_to_grow_food_for/

ETA:

We recommend four widely applicable high-impact (i.e. low emissions) actions with the potential to contribute to systemic change and substantially reduce annual personal emissions: having one fewer child (an average for developed countries of 58.6 tonnes CO2-equivalent (tCO2e) emission reductions per year), living car-free (2.4 tCO2e saved per year), avoiding airplane travel (1.6 tCO2e saved per roundtrip transatlantic flight) and eating a plant-based diet (0.8 tCO2e saved per year). These actions have much greater potential to reduce emissions than commonly promoted strategies like comprehensive recycling (four times less effective than a plant-based diet) or changing household lightbulbs (eight times less).

^https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541/pdf^

yeah that pretty much checks out. The best solution to climate change is to kill shit like private jets and yachts. But that's unlikely to happen.

[-] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

The best solution to climate change is to kill shit like private jets and yachts.

I severely doubt those emissions are anything but negligible because there are so few yachts and jets.

[-] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 0 points 1 month ago

What's an easier solution, in your opinion? Getting the ultra wealthy to give up their yachts and jets (by getting rid of the ultra wealthy entirely, which also addresses the evils of capitalism), or convincing hundreds of millions of people to change just about everything about the diet they've been eating for tens of thousands of years?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

The animal industry feeds the plants as much as the plants feed the animals. I'm not sure how vegans feel about synthetic fertilizer like miracle grow, but that's what will have to be used in place of manure if the meat industry goes away.

Many of the organic crops grown use animal manure to fertilize the plants. I know you can use seaweed and other plants for compost(weeds are already composted back in via tilling, seaweed requires harvesting from the ocean or long distance shipping from farms), as well as cycling crops to prevent nutrient deficiency.....

BUT manure doesn't just add nutrients. It adds beneficial bacteria that helps keep the soil healthy and make the nutrients bioavailable to plants. It conditions the soil for water retention, and helps break up clay soil and add organic matter to sandy soil.

Will vegans keep animals just for manure? Or will organic lables on food be less important? Are we going to start scraping the forests for leaves to chop up an add to farm soil? That can't be good for forests though. I guess I'm just confused about how to maintain large farms without access to large amounts of manure.

an interesting idea, but anything that decays and "composts" can be used as a fertilizer so.

This includes things like organic scraps, you don't just have to use animal shit. Although it's a pretty good one if you have access to it.

I think personally, we should move to a more decentralized food production system, to help alleviate some of the costs of industrial agriculture, which are pretty heavy.

[-] skibidi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

The ideal answer is compost, regenerative agriculture, and (better treated) human-sources waste.

Organic crop yields will almost certainly reduce a bit without animal waste fertilizer, but that is fine since crop consumption will fall by a greater amount due to not needing to feed a bunch of extra animals.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

We humans shit as well

load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26473 readers
384 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS