795
Zen Z (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago by arunshah240@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 month ago

Digital isn't better it's just different. Also a tonne of wristwatches are still analogue.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It absolutely is tho. Usually more precise, 1:1 translatable into written text, can use the superior 24h system and uses the same reading system that is already taught in school anyways.

[-] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

"Ususally more precise" > This depends on how precisely it is set, not on the display. Unless it's a connected watch, but then it's much more expensive and less energy efficient.

"1.1 translatable into written text" > Both are, you're reading the same number

"Uses the superior 24h system" > Adding 12 to a number isn't complicated. And with habit, most people who use analog watches and the 24h system know which position of the needle means what number in 24h format without doing the math. Some clocks don't even have digits. Unless you've been sedated and woke up in a room without windows, you'll know which side of 12 you're on. And otherwise, you've got more pressing issues.

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 5 points 1 month ago

Right! Just to prove a point, I am going to make an NTP enabled rolex, and sync it to my microsecond accurate local NTP server! :P

[-] Incandemon@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

To be fair, I did have a watch that automatically synced itself to the us naval observatories atomic clocks over the air.

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, but you need to factor in the distance to the transmitter. Going to add at least a few microseconds to your time accuracy!

[-] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Latency is accounted for in the sync process

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 4 points 1 month ago

Sync process? The other comment was talking about the old receivers for the atomic clocks on SW/MW frequencies. It was a one way thing.

Now in theory if a receiver also had GPS they could account for the distance. But, then they'd get far more accurate time from the GPS receiver so..

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

The watches/clocks they are talking about listened to WWV, a set of radio stations transmitting from Fort Collins, Colorado. The system long predates the Network Time Protocol you're referring to. Radio controlled clocks/watches had no means for accounting for latency.

[-] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Ahh OK my bad. I've only worked with NTP for a long time and wasn't aware of the earlier stuff.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

If you're interested in prehistory, listen to this for a couple minutes.

[-] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

There's nothing stopping an analog clock face from representing 24h time:

Image

[-] Emmie@lemmings.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

🤢 what an utter abomination

This is why puppies die

[-] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

I was ready to hate it but after a good look, it doesn't look that bad. Doesn't work for small wristwatches but could look nice for a big wall clock.

[-] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

How many people wear an analog wrist watch to actually keep time anymore? It’s jewelry / a specialized tool at this point (scuba and such).

[-] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

I wear a watch for the time. I like it more than using my phone.

[-] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes so do I. And how many of our friends/colleagues wear an analog wrist watch daily to check the time?

My dad and my father in law are probably the only two people i know who regularly wear them.

[-] Faresh@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I used to have one, but now I set my phone clock to be displayed as an analogue clock so that kind of made it obsolete, since it now has all the benefits of an analogue display with the additional advantage of automatically syncing time and adjusting for time zones and daylight saving time.

[-] Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Depends for me. In my casual day to day I don't but when I had a lot of appointments to meet I find it quicker to check the time on my wrist than bu fumbling for my smartphone in my pocket, something that is probably even more true for women if they store their phone in a small bag due to lack of pockets.

Also, sometimes I like leaving my phone at home because I have unfortunately developed the tendency to give it a short glance whenever I have downtime. If I still need to know the time I can still wear a wristwatch.

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
795 points (91.8% liked)

Memes

45189 readers
1958 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS