375
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by robocall@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] norimee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Of course they do. Did we really need a study for that?

[-] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 1 month ago

Your comment reads like a Facebook comment. That's the whole point of science, don't trust common sense, prove it.

[-] norimee@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

I just always wonder what we gain scientifically with these kind of studies. Why do we need to prove this? Aren't there any more important issues these scientists could use their time and money on?

I'm asking in all earnestness. What is the benefit of this knowlege?

[-] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

There's been scientific and philosophical debates for a long time about which cognitive traits are specific to humans and which are shared across species, and which trait is specific to each group. This is just another element to add to this debate.

If you're wondering how this can be applied, it's not the researcher's job to know. A lot of the time, a discovery's practical applications are only found decades after the discovery itself. Some are never used, but we can't know in advance which knowledge will be useful.

So ideally, those who work in fundamental research needn't consern themselves with the potential use of their work, they seek knowledge for itself. If there's useful stuff in there, applied scientists and engineers will pick it up later. Ideally, but unfortunately, researchers may need to convince a patron that their research will be useful if they need private fundings, which can be a problem. Sometimes, they'll have to put a little bullshit in their pitch for companies. But since this probably wasn't a very expensive study, maybe public grants were enough. Or maybe they convinced some company that they could use it to promote cat antidepressants.

[-] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago

I don't know as biology(?) is not my area of expertise. The way I see it it can be valuable for us as a society to be more empathetic? I know you shouldn't need science for that but hey ...

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

That’s the whole point of science, don’t trust common sense, prove it.

This has nothing to do with common sense - it's easily observable behavior that any experienced pet owner could tell you about.

[-] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 month ago

It's still anecdotal evidence which turns into common sense. You need science and method to validate these things.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

It’s still anecdotal evidence which turns into common sense.

You mean how the "anecdotal evidence" that the earth is actually round turned into "common sense?"

Yeah, you're completely right - none of that shit should be trusted until an overmoneyed dork with a fancy piece of tertiary education institution stationary shows up to prove how stupid we are for doing anything without his approval.

[-] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not sure why you're getting so acid. I never said you can only believe in scientists, just pointed its usefulness to validate beliefs. Can you show me where I said it?

You seem to have a massive negative bias against "overmoneyed dork" which I assume is scientists, so I don't think we're going anywhere here.

And to further your ignorance: Ancient Greeks knew the earth was round and mathematicians helped prove it.. so one of the "dorks".

[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago

The whole point of science is to study to prove or disprove theories. So yes.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 8 points 1 month ago
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Evolution is only a THEORY! Like gravity!

[-] norimee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I am absolutely pro science. But in all earnestness, what is the use of such a study?

[-] teletext@reddthat.com 30 points 1 month ago

There's anecdotal "knowledge", and there is science.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That which is easily observable is not "anecdotal."

[-] teletext@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago

That which is easily observable should be easily to study scientifically.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

A lot of people legitimately think cats are loner sociopaths. So yes, some science to back up the cat owners of the world would be appreciated.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So many of those people treat their cat like a lamp though. Of course your cat is a "loner sociopath" - if you barely interact with it and never give it attention or enrichment it's going to fuck off and do its own thing without you.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Or a bunch try to treat their cat like a dog, which also won't work.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

A lot of people legitimately think cats are loner sociopaths.

That says more about the people who think this than cats.

[-] norimee@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

So you need serious scientists to spend time, resources and money on a scientific study so you can tell cat haters "Gotcha. I told you so!"??

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

You wouldn't believe how much good stuff we have because we were finally able to point to a study to shut up haters.

[-] veeesix@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

Definitive proof is harder to dismiss than an old wives tale.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

While I get your point, "cats have feelings" is hardly on the same level as old wives tales lol

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
375 points (97.7% liked)

science

14348 readers
622 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS