77
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks, I definitely skimmed the article, so missing that is on me.

It's interesting that the profile they mention doesn't really fit what I have in my mind for mass shooters, which would be younger men, not middle-aged. I guess the ones that really stick out to me, like the Columbine, Christchurch, and Uvalde shooters all fit this stereotype that I have, but apparently that doesn't map to reality.

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 5 points 1 month ago

the Columbine, Christchurch, and Uvalde shooters all fit this stereotype that I have, but apparently that doesn’t map to reality.

I think people don't realize how many mass shootings happen in the US. Mostly because they don't typically make the news outside the place they occur.

CW: List of mass shootings in the US for 2024 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_shootings_in_the_United_States_in_2024

TL;DR: There have been 372 this year alone. That is 372 in 218 days, so more than one a day on average

[-] TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I addressed that briefly in my first comment. This definition of "mass shooting" is much, much broader and very different from what most people are thinking of when people talk about mass shootings. Like, I'm fully aware of how serious the gun violence problem in the US is, but I'm not thinking of a domestic violence situation where multiple people got injured, or a gang related shooting at a club where some bystanders are killed when I hear the term "mass shooting". Don't get me wrong, those situations are tragic, and the availability of guns in the US makes them so much worse, but I understand the psychology of them pretty well, I think. It's not a mystery to me why they are happening. But the kind of situation where a person goes to a place and just starts indiscriminately shooting people is what I don't understand, and it's what I tend to think of when people talk about "mass shootings". Maybe this is just me being wrong, or maybe it's a problem of imprecise terminology.

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago

Oh totally. The definition is strictly numbers based. I don't think that is useful when you are trying to dig deep into the cause.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
77 points (100.0% liked)

Science

12944 readers
10 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS