18
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kbal@fedia.io 4 points 2 months ago

That seems like a lot of trouble to go to just for one clickbait headline.

[-] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 months ago

I mean, we all knew it was quite easy, but I still think that it's journalistically valuable to go through with it to see, and show how easy it actually is.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago

Maybe. When Reuters publishes such a thing it just makes me wonder what crazy new law they are trying to gin up support for. As they say "When authorities restrict one chemical, suppliers and traffickers just switch to another." It worries me to imagine what kind of "solution" they might dream up for that problem.

[-] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 months ago

I think that assuming that editorial decisions are never influenced by financial interests would be naive, but they're such a big organisation that covers such a breadth of topics that it would also seem foolish to assume a douplicitous intent behind every story. It might just be journalist covering a currently relatively widely discussed topic.

Also, Reuters generally does quite well in remaining relatively neutral in their coverage (though that impression might of course just be based on my biases).

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22032 readers
33 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS