91

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/35022759

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

YouTube was built on illegal content and still has a buttload of illegal content and Google knows it but won't do anything about it. Let's not call the kettle black.

If they really want to be serious about it fine, turn it into paid-only access. It will neatly solve the whole ad debacle and they won't have to play cat and mouse with VPNs and blocking and all these shenanigans.

Ask yourself why they don't do that. It's because 90% of the content on there is illegal and when they host it for free they have an excuse. But if they turn the whole thing private and ask for money to access it they become liable for all of it.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

90% is definitely not illegal. Have numbers to prove it?

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 3 months ago

Lol. Yeah it's all fresh or properly sourced material.

Go search for any music video. You should be finding exactly one (1) official entry. In some cases there are legit live recordings + montage that should also be only one of.

Instead there are dozens or hundreds, and most of them are not transformative enough to qualify for fair use. Google knows which ones are there illegaly because they are clearly able to identify and demonetize them.

But why not straight out delete them, or tell the uploader to delete them or else? Because they want to have lots of content regardless if it's legit, and they want to show ads, just as long as it goes to the right people.

They can put ads on questionable content that's free to watch as long as they're ready to remove it if and when asked, but they can't sell a product based on questionable content. It comes too close to what piracy websites are doing.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

If the content owner doesn't care enough to take them down, why should Google? They're not liable. Everyone benefits.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago

I'm just explaining why Google can't put YouTube behind a paywall. It's fine as long as it's an open platform. If it becomes a paid product it raises the bar.

this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
91 points (95.0% liked)

Android

27484 readers
149 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS