921
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 months ago

tar was nearly and adult when zip was born.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago

See my reply here: https://midwest.social/comment/10257041

The two aren't really equivalent. They make different tradeoffs. The scheme of "compress individual files, then archive" from GP is what zip does. Tar does "archive first, then compress the whole thing".

[-] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 months ago

The link does not load for some reason, but tar itself does not compress anything. Compression can (and usually is) applied afterwards, but that's an additional integration that is not part of Tape ARchive, as such.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago

Yes, I'm aware of how this works.

The important point is that zip and compressed tarballs have overlapping but not identical purposes.

this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
921 points (99.0% liked)

linuxmemes

20707 readers
1182 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS