710
Reality check (programming.dev)
submitted 4 months ago by sus@programming.dev to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
119 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sandalbucket@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

We could call it … WebAssembly! And now it’s a C compilation target, which means we can run Node.js in the browser, to get a javascript runtime :)

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 months ago

Isn't that the other way around? Developing for the web in assembly is not the same as running assembly on a browser.

[-] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

It could be the same.

[-] Aux@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Usually when people are talking about web development in assembly they mean development back end applications.

[-] feedmecontent@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Does node have wasm support yet? Corporations have been looking for a way to stack performance degradation on the web to an arbitrary degree. The Node running on wasm running on node running on wasm running on node running on wasm running in the browser stack could get so hot.

this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
710 points (90.2% liked)

linuxmemes

20707 readers
1089 users here now

I use Arch btw

Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
poopsmith@lemmy.world
zephyr@lemmy.world