289
submitted 5 months ago by sandro_linux@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] loanrangerofpeanuts@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago

The plane is 7 years old. This isn’t a Boeing issue, this is a Southwest maintenance issue. Engine cowlings are regularly removed for maintenance. If a latch or latches aren’t properly secured or suffer from excessive wear then this is the outcome. I get the disdain for Boeing, but it should be based on issues of their negligence, not the negligence of their customers.

[-] tomatolung@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Arguably. Reading the comments on avhearld, the cowling latches to each other rather than to the frame and the latches themselves are very low and easy to miss. Airbus has tried to eliminate this potential oversight, whereas Boeing has not. So yes, potentially missed non walk around, but also a possible systematic design failure.

https://avherald.com/h?article=51721379&opt=0

[-] invno1@lemmy.one 1 points 5 months ago

Not arguably, still a maintaine issue with the owner of the plane.

[-] tomatolung@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Failures of design can lead to maintenance failures. Where as maintenance failures do not always stem from failures of design.

So not mutually exclusive in this case.

[-] invno1@lemmy.one 1 points 5 months ago

First sentence is true. Last sentence is not. We'll see.

this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
289 points (97.7% liked)

World News

32075 readers
869 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS