199

Movie industry demands US law requiring ISPs to block piracy websites (arstechnica.com)

submitted 5 months ago by Glass0448@lemmy.today to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me 10 points 5 months ago

Hopefully this doesn't affect quad9 or cloud flare DNS, or I might have to go back to running a root resolver. The horrors.

[-] Achsonaja@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

Why not run unbound for a recursive resolver? Seems like a more private DNS solution

[-] theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I have straight bind running on my network already for local zones, it would be easy enough to switch it to be a root resolver. The only problem is it's a lot slower. I use DoT to cloudflare for non-local zones (using blocky); if you run a root resolver, your DNS traffic is all in the clear. Not like it truly matters but I wouldn't put it past my ISP to do DPI on DNS traffic to try to sell my data.

[-] safesyrup@lemmy.hogru.ch 4 points 5 months ago

Do you know if cloudflare is privacy respecting? I know quad9 certainly is

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

is it though? what makes it trustworthy?

[-] theamigan@lemmy.dynatron.me 2 points 5 months ago

I trust them more than my ISP (Verizon). Quad9 is, and I used it for some time as an upstream, but it is markedly slower for me than cloudflare. Those milliseconds add up for an impatient asshole like myself.