351

Baldur's Gate 4 Isn't Next For Larian; Something Bigger Is Coming | Spot On | Gamespot (www.youtube.com)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by ampersandrew@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world

167 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is a really good interview. tl;dw is...

their next game was going to be D&D, but they changed course and are doing something else now
Vincke has a vision for "the one RPG to rule them all", and each of their past three RPGs is a step closer to it
the next game is not going to be that master vision but one step closer toward it, with their previous 3 RPGs proving out emergent design/multiplayer, story and consequence, and personal stories/performance capture, respectively
Vincke would like to have this next game done in 3 years compared to BG3's 6 year development cycle, but realistically expects 4 years, as long as there isn't something like COVID-19 or a war in Ukraine to impede their progress

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] umbraroze@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

I'm, like, oof? History repeating itself much?

There was this little RPG company, BioWare, that made this little known game called... uh... Baldur's Gate or something. Then they made Baldur's Gate II. And all was fine. And then they said "you know what, we should do something really cool and innovative and creative!" ...And they did! They made Neverwinter Nights. And Wizards of the Coast/Hasbro was a real drag in the process, wanting them so many compliance meetings regarding the content and canon and game mechanics. So Bioware was like "OK this is the absolute last time we work with this kind of nitpickers, we'll create our own fantasy RPG setting and system." ...and that's how Dragon Age came about.

WotC/Hasbro isn't any easier to work with these days, that's for sure. Except this time, even the tabletop fans know that.

Hopefully Larian gets to eventually make the epicest dream game they can and, uh, not get bought out by EA or something.

[-] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Kinda backwards with Larian as they already made original IPs before BG3. Which were critical hits already.

[-] MalachaiConstant@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

The divinity games definitely felt inspired by DND. I've even been able to convince friends (including some who don't play video games at all) to pick it up because of how similar it feels to tabletop. Larian was a natural choice for BG3 and I'm convinced that was part of the vision with their early work

[-] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

Whether they get bought out is up to the owner(s) right? If they refuse, then that’s that.

[-] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

I think Larian is already partly owned by someone (Tencent?) so EA is unlikely

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Yes, despite what Larian wants you to believe, 30% of the company was sold to Tencent years ago to raise more money for BG3. Afaik Danny O'Dwyer dug that up from the irish business register because Larian never even made a statement about it. Instead they keep pointing out how privately owned they are and that there is nothing to worry about.

BG3 was a massive success, but I wonder how much of that cake is left after 450 employees, Bioware, WotC and Tencent got their pieces of that. If they really want to release a much bigger game in half the time, they'll need to tripple their employees which will absolutely explode spendings. They have nothing else in the works until then, no mobile game cash cow or big merch sales to keep them afloat. The only way to generate more money when production costs will inevitably exceed expectations is... to sell more of themselves.