476
submitted 6 months ago by nutomic@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kierunkowy74@kbin.social 39 points 6 months ago

You could peek at two opposing views on the same article, for example.

Post-truth as a service.

[-] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

Wikipedia information is often made up of media reports and paid studies so we're already there.

[-] ikka@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 months ago

Post-truth as a service.

If you read through this page you might even conclude that Wikipedia itself is "post-truth"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedia_controversies

At any point in time you could be reading a defaced or propagandized version of an article.

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

Not only is the noise ratio low, this seems like a good lesson in "encyclopedias are not primary sources nor arbiters nor authorities on information." Yes, people use Wikipedia that way anyway. No, baking in an even lower trust system does not seem like it's actually a fix to any of Wikipedia's problems.

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
476 points (92.8% liked)

Fediverse

17535 readers
30 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS