629
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
629 points (88.3% liked)
Technology
58157 readers
3619 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I know, I said sarcasm is hard, didn't I?
You mean it is hard for you to execute it?
That also doesn't make much sense as a reply.
Man, get those neurons checked. If you think the initial comment wasn't sarcasm, you need. to go and read the definition.
It absolutely wasn't "sarcasm".
OK, maybe it wasn't sarcasm in the traditional sense, but it was clearly not something pro-Musk, which is why most dumbasses are downvoting.
No, it wasn't sarcasm in any sense.
I like how you completely ignored the other aspect of what I said. It says a lot about who you are and how you debate.
I didn't care about the other aspect you were trying to steer to.
But also no, the downvotes we're because the comment was stupid. Then you tried to lie about "sarcasm" and how other people were too stupid to get it, which got you a bunch more.
I don't really care about the personal attacks you're trying to make. But blocking you, since you seem like a child lashing out when called out, and it's worthless.