111

'The Witcher 4 will channel the “freedom” of CDPR’s Cyberpunk 2077' (www.pcgamesn.com)

submitted 10 months ago by Carighan@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“Our trademark is the freedom given to the player, but always with limits,” Kalemba tells Lega Nerd

Aye, they try to hype the idea of a main quest line as something that defines their design.

😅

Thinking back I'm not sure I want Witcher 4 to feel more like CP2077, tbh. Less, if anything.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] BluesF@feddit.uk 19 points 10 months ago

I feel like the kind of "freedom" players want from an RPG is somewhat inconsistent with playing as a specific character, i.e. Geralt. For me, I want to be my own character and decide who they are and what they do. I never really got on with Geralt because I don't want to be a moody medieval jedi, I'd much rather be a whimsical wizard or something.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Ah yeah, definitely.

As someone who personally enjoys a told story more than a lot of directionless freedom (because I get bored after a few dozen hours, so I want the game to get its thing told and then I'm ready for the next game, basically) I of course enjoyed Geralt's directed character more, but the two are definitely incompatible at a very basic level.

And honestly, none is inherently better, though I wish studios understood more readily just how different the underlying approach is. If someone creates a defined story then give me those fully defined characters. Give me a cool story through which I learn of them. With a few surprises. Make it like a book! On the other hand, if something is freeform, then go hard the opposite way. Make it sandbox-y! Allow me to create narrative myself through what I do, don't hold my hand and try to guide me back onto rails.

(That is, the main story was just about the part I enjoyed the least in CP2077 next to the bugs, and I really don't think V's character fits the gameplay and what we players do in it very well. V is an interesting character, but not for an open world do-whatever-you-want game, and the game they created doesn't fit a character that is supposed to have a specific design very well.)

[-] rishado@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Then play elder scrolls? Witcher has never been anything close to what you're describing

[-] BluesF@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago

I'm not suggesting it should be at all. Not sure how you got that from my comment. I liked the Witcher 3, honestly, but it isn't a game about freedom and it shouldn't be imo. It tells character focused stories well, which is harder to do the more choice you give the player.

[-] Lemming6969@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago

So you don't want the R in RPG, and what you'll get for that is the same generic game over and over again.

[-] BluesF@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago

What? That isn't what I said at all.

[-] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"You don't want to be forced to play a specific role, and that removes the R in RPG" is what they are saying. However, I disagree with them. Real RPGs let you choose your role, ethical alignment, and quirks of behavior. Even older video games like Fallout 3 have that. Being forced to play a specific role is almost antithetical to the concept of RPGs.

Of course, maybe that's not what they meant at all.