321

Oh, AutoDesk...you have such a way with words. Honestly, I would rather learn to design in OpenSCAD than send AutoDesk a single penny.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 20 points 9 months ago

Just so nobody fires up freecad thinking they're about to get a commercial experience:

FreeCAD sucks. It works. But it sucks. There's basically no community. Development is fractured and slow. Some workflows that are trivial in solid works are tedious in freecad.

But it works. And it's foss. If you need something that runs on Linux, it's the way to go.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

I use FreeCAD exclusively, and while it does have several aspects about it that still suck, I have to say that it's has improved dramatically by the current release (0.21.1, I think) versus when I started using it which was around 0.18.

I have definitely found the workflow for certain operations to be a bit obtuse, but I've never actually had it been unable to do whatever I was trying to accomplish, ultimately, somehow in some way.

I'll take FreeCAD's quirks and foibles over any type of predatory subscription, licensing, or cloud only bullshit AutoDesk or Solidworks or whoever the hell else is up to. Any day, any time.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

I also started using it around that time. And I agree with everything you said except the part where said it's improved dramatically. It's improved, yes, but I would call those improvements minimal, not dramatic, especially considering it's taken five years to accomplish them.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I don't know, I think the tree dependency fix in 0.2 was pretty huge. The rest of the stuff I can pretty much take or leave, including all the new toolbar icons which wasted who knows how many man-hours that probably could have been better spent elsewhere... But not having all my parts bork themselves because god forbid I modified a feature at the top of the tree rather than the bottom made using FreeCAD go from exhausting to use to actually properly functional -- at least for me.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Disagree. I thought freecad was awesome. But I didn't use it professionally...just as a hobbyist teaching myself cad.

The most frustrating thing for me was the changes between versions and finding the right tutorial to match your version was frustrating.

It's the equivalent of gimp vs Photoshop.

[-] mindlight@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

This is my experience too. It's like people repeating 20 years of Gimp vs Photoshop.

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
321 points (99.1% liked)

3DPrinting

15276 readers
95 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS