78
submitted 10 months ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SiriusCybernetics@lemmy.ca -2 points 10 months ago

Wars should be consensual. If one side doesn’t want war then that should be that. If the other pursues the world should stop ‘em. Kinda like same principle as rape. Like sex is great. Rape not so much.

[-] rosymind@leminal.space 2 points 9 months ago

Seriously?

What nation goes: "Hey neighbor, you wanna kill a bunch of each other's soldiers and use a bunch of resources and pollute the earth? Maybe we can also kill some innocent babies while bombing hospitals for funsies?"

Wars are usually fought because one nation (or group) wants what the other has. If a side could get exactly what they want, there wouldn't be a war over it.

Wars are about taking: land, people, resources, revenge.

There's nothing consensual about it

[-] SiriusCybernetics@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

That’s my point. My view is an international law about consent to war would be a good thing. Generally speaking, most countries deserve territorial sovereignty and shouldn’t have someone fucking around with them. I don’t think the “want what the other has” justifies wars. Corporations can do that well enough…

[-] rosymind@leminal.space 2 points 9 months ago

There are laws against breaking into people's houses, but it still happens. Just because someone proclaims something illegal doesn't mean it just stops happening. That's just not how the world works

[-] interolivary@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

This idea just begs the question of how exactly do you think international law works

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
78 points (95.3% liked)

World News

32075 readers
835 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS