269
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by dmtalon@infosec.pub to c/homeassistant@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HerbSolo@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Companies should be held accountable for bullshit like that.

My idea goes like this: In order to be able to sell some device you need to deposit its source code and the sources for all updates with the proper authorities.

If you then don't provide updates maintaining a) security and b) functionality of said device, because for example you go bankrupt, financially, or like in this very case morally, all of those sources are released and from then on are open source.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

A Deadman switch on the source sounds like an eff thing. I'd support it. Heck, while I was still maintaining a well-used oss app, I'd've wanted a Deadman switch on the signing keys so distro could continue without stress, but the sad fact was no one picked up my project even when I announced its impending doom.

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I kind of like your idea... But I am not sure if the authorities would be great for this....

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
269 points (99.6% liked)

homeassistant

11833 readers
9 users here now

Home Assistant is open source home automation that puts local control and privacy first. Powered by a worldwide community of tinkerers and DIY enthusiasts. Perfect to run on a Raspberry Pi or a local server. Available for free at home-assistant.io

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS