1061
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

That's my point, by mistrusting every other website, OP is violating axioms upon which Wikipedia is built, yet still claiming it's trustworthy

[-] Urist@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

Ah, I now see better what you meant. That is in part a fun little contradiction, but much of Wikipedia's sources are books and articles that come in printed form. These are easier than other websites to verify as sources due to their tangible nature.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

But it takes more effort to confirm a tangible source than one on the internet?

[-] Urist@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Not really. Just sail the high seas with Library Genesis or Sci-Hub. The nature of being published is being non-editable, a digital copy is an okay compromise.

EDIT: There is an issue of trust in piracy, though hardly in practice, but Open Access should help with this.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Oh, you're taking me literally. Sorry I didn't catch that.

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
1061 points (90.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

29235 readers
466 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS