449
Saw a news story people about people getting arrested for at Wal-Mart for forgeting to scan one item (midwest.social)
submitted 1 year ago by Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social to c/memes@lemmy.ml
110 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://youtu.be/tmoQxq2P7Y4?feature=shared

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They can't detain you even if they think you have stolen, though (from a store policy perspective). There's a reason all these stores train employees "observe don't interfere".

[-] TauZero@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

Shopkeeper's privilege does exist, many stores simply choose not to exercise it.

[-] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

As I mentioned, "from a store policies perspective". The shrinkage isn't worth the liability and risk for Walmart.

[-] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

so long as the shopkeeper has cause to believe that the person detained in fact committed, or attempted to commit, theft

Shop keepers privilege can't be used as a reason to detain customers for a receipt check. They don't have "cause" as they did not see the person concealing anything.

[-] TauZero@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

That's true! Receipt checks can get lost! I was replying to "They can’t detain you even if they think you have stolen" though. The "can't" is a store policy thing, not a law thing.

[-] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

i really want to get tackled so i can sue

now i always DEMAND that they scan my groceries for me

this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
449 points (91.3% liked)

Memes

45413 readers
545 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml